Le site icr.org est-il sûr ?

La confiance de WOT

Score de sécurité du site web

66%
Le score de sécurité de WOT est basé sur notre technologie unique et sur les avis des experts de la communauté.
Ce site est-il revendiqué ?
Non
Avis de la Communauté
★ 3.5
L'algorithme de WOT
69%
Sécurité pour les Enfants
70%

Que dit la communauté ?

Laisser un commentaire

Quelle note entre 1 et 5 donneriez-vous à ce site ?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Faites part de vos commentaires et aidez la communautéLes commentaires doivent comporter au moins 15 caractèresChoisissez les tags qui décrivent le mieux ce site web
Logiciels malveillants ou virus
Mauvais service client
Hameçonnage
Escroquerie
Potentiellement illégal
Fallacieux ou contraire à l’éthique
Risques relatifs à la confidentialité
Suspect
Haine, discrimination
Escroquerie
Programme potentiellement indésirable
Publicités / fenêtres pop-up
Contenu pour adultes
Nudité accidentelle
Violent ou choquant
Annuler
Publier le commentaire
3.5
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star

Basé sur 36 avis

Classer par :
Le plus récent
Another religious cult site. Contains bible-literalism, speaks against some sexual orientations, and has anti-science theology. It is another right-winged religious site.
1
This website promotes pseudoscience, defiling real science to preserve both personal and religious agendas.
1
Pseudoscience, nonsense. Diplomas by this institute are not accepted by regular universities.
1
How does a site this fraught with fraud maintain a "good" rating? ICR promotes nonsense as science, and fights to undermine the education of our children.
2
An "Institute for research," of any kind, should not write articles full of emotionally charged language that seek to force the data to fit one pre-determined solution. Good research starts with information and then evaluates theories in the light of the data. However, this site evaluates data in the light of a theory. Due to the ethical issues of this website's reporting, I cannot vote it trustworthy or safe for children. At first glance, the site appears to be free of spyware though, so the other scores will remain high.
4
Slows down rational thoughts and condemns anything colliding with written literature created long ago to fill our gap of basic human curiosity of life's meaning. All this and claiming it to be a professional scientific site. In other words dangerous and self fulfilling nonsense is written all over it.
4
Lies and misinformation. A disgusting pile of political propaganda.
4
Psuedoscience & lies.
8
This parades as a scientific resource, when in fact is a religious website. I don't mind a religious website per se, but to parade as a resource of scientific rigor is ethically wrong.
10
The site could have been a good site for an alternate viewpoint if not for the fact that the articles are misleading and lacking research. The header uses such misleading words as "accurate" and "certain", but the articles do not provide any accurate or certain proof. The proof typically is based on the author's opinion. Example (from an author who prefaces his article with the disclaimer that he's "not particularly up on human anatomy"): "A person can function quite adequately without the gallbladder under normal conditions, but it's better to keep it. Mine was infected and damaged and is now gone, and I haven't missed it . . . but I wonder. ...Ever since sin entered the perfect creation and all systems began to deteriorate, sometimes things don't perform optimally." The author offers no proof to dispute the argument that the gallbladder is a vestigial organ, aside from the notion that "sin" has deteriorated our bodies, causing some things to not perform "optimally". He can give no reason as to why humans have tailbones, wisdom teeth, or other parts of the body considered unnecessary. If we follow his assumption that sin has caused things to "not perform optimally", how does he explain death from old age? Sin does not cause organs to deteriorate and age. The flesh is simply not immortal.
11
Sitio Creacionista. muy buena información para los que creen en la Biblia y la defienden desde su primer versiculo. Claro, a los RELIGIOSOS EVOLUCIONISTAS no les gusta, pues son INTOLERANTES a cualquiera que piense distinto a ellos y nos califican como "mentes débiles". "
2
Shows the science behind creation.
4
Great devotional for each day.
5
The organization has been a great source for scientific information concerning the origins of the universe for many years.
12
This organization has been accused of being an unaccredited diploma mill, which offers degrees that would not be accepted by other institutions.
13
Great science aspect apologetic site for Christian research.
10
12
Vérifiez si vous avez été compromisConnectez-vous à Google pour analyser votre historique de navigation.
Se connecter avec Google
Tel que vu sur
En vous connectant, vous acceptez la collecte et l'utilisation des données telles qu'elles sont décrites dans notre site web. Conditions d'utilisation et Politique de Confidentialité
alternative-placeholder

À propos de WOT

Nous avons passé en revue plus de 2 millions de sites web et ce n'est pas fini. WOT est une extension légère conçue pour vous aider à naviguer rapidement et en toute sécurité. Il nettoie votre navigateur, l'accélère et protège vos informations privées.

C'est votre site ?

Réclamez votre site web pour accéder aux outils commerciaux de WOT et entrer en contact avec vos clients.
Réclamer ce site
Ce site utilise des cookies à des fins d'analyse et de personnalisation. En continuant, vous acceptez notre politique en matière de cookies.
Accepter