Le site icr.org est-il sûr ?

Considéré comme sûr par WOT

3.3
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
(35 avis)
Bon site
Opinions, religion, politique
Je détiens ce site
Demander à notre communauté
Partager :
Partagez votre avis...
starempty-star
Mauvais
starempty-star
Correct
starempty-star
Moyen
starempty-star
Bon
starempty-star
Excellent
35 avis dans la communauté
Classer par :
Le plus récent
La protection en ligne la plus fiable
6 août 2013
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This website promotes pseudoscience, defiling real science to preserve both personal and religious agendas.
Utile
1
1 juin 2013
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Pseudoscience, nonsense. Diplomas by this institute are not accepted by regular universities.
Utile
1
28 févr. 2013
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
How does a site this fraught with fraud maintain a "good" rating? ICR promotes nonsense as science, and fights to undermine the education of our children.
Utile
2
27 févr. 2013
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
An "Institute for research," of any kind, should not write articles full of emotionally charged language that seek to force the data to fit one pre-determined solution. Good research starts with information and then evaluates theories in the light of the data. However, this site evaluates data in the light of a theory. Due to the ethical issues of this website's reporting, I cannot vote it trustworthy or safe for children. At first glance, the site appears to be free of spyware though, so the other scores will remain high.
Utile
4
29 janv. 2013
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Slows down rational thoughts and condemns anything colliding with written literature created long ago to fill our gap of basic human curiosity of life's meaning. All this and claiming it to be a professional scientific site. In other words dangerous and self fulfilling nonsense is written all over it.
Utile
4
23 août 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Lies and misinformation. A disgusting pile of political propaganda.
Utile
4
2 juil. 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Psuedoscience & lies.
Utile
8
24 févr. 2012
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This parades as a scientific resource, when in fact is a religious website. I don't mind a religious website per se, but to parade as a resource of scientific rigor is ethically wrong.
Utile
10
16 juil. 2011
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
The site could have been a good site for an alternate viewpoint if not for the fact that the articles are misleading and lacking research. The header uses such misleading words as "accurate" and "certain", but the articles do not provide any accurate or certain proof. The proof typically is based on the author's opinion. Example (from an author who prefaces his article with the disclaimer that he's "not particularly up on human anatomy"): "A person can function quite adequately without the gallbladder under normal conditions, but it's better to keep it. Mine was infected and damaged and is now gone, and I haven't missed it . . . but I wonder. ...Ever since sin entered the perfect creation and all systems began to deteriorate, sometimes things don't perform optimally." The author offers no proof to dispute the argument that the gallbladder is a vestigial organ, aside from the notion that "sin" has deteriorated our bodies, causing some things to not perform "optimally". He can give no reason as to why humans have tailbones, wisdom teeth, or other parts of the body considered unnecessary. If we follow his assumption that sin has caused things to "not perform optimally", how does he explain death from old age? Sin does not cause organs to deteriorate and age. The flesh is simply not immortal.
Utile
11
31 mai 2011
starstarstarstarstar
Sitio Creacionista. muy buena información para los que creen en la Biblia y la defienden desde su primer versiculo. Claro, a los RELIGIOSOS EVOLUCIONISTAS no les gusta, pues son INTOLERANTES a cualquiera que piense distinto a ellos y nos califican como "mentes débiles". "
Utile
2
3 mai 2011
starstarstarstarstar
Shows the science behind creation.
Utile
4
9 mars 2011
starstarstarstarstar
Great devotional for each day.
Utile
5
5 févr. 2009
starstarstarstarhalf-star
The organization has been a great source for scientific information concerning the origins of the universe for many years.
Utile
12
5 févr. 2009
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
This organization has been accused of being an unaccredited diploma mill, which offers degrees that would not be accepted by other institutions.
Utile
13
22 déc. 2008
starstarstarstarstar
Great science aspect apologetic site for Christian research.
Utile
10
«
12
»

À propos de ce site

Bacterial Clutch Denotes Design The bacterial flagellum has amazed observers because of its intricate and minute design. It exhibits remarkable efficiency, construction, and function in the tiny cells where it serves as a motorized propeller. Now further research of flagellar motor operation has

Indice de Confiance
66
/100
Sécurité pour les Enfants
69
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept