Le site livingwhole.org est-il sûr ?

Site web inconnu

Score de sécurité du site web

18%
Le score de sécurité de WOT est basé sur notre technologie unique et sur les avis des experts de la communauté.
Ce site est-il revendiqué ?
Non
Avis de la Communauté
★ 1.1
L'algorithme de WOT
21%
Sécurité pour les Enfants
N/A

Que dit la communauté ?

Laisser un commentaire

Quelle note entre 1 et 5 donneriez-vous à ce site ?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Faites part de vos commentaires et aidez la communautéLes commentaires doivent comporter au moins 15 caractèresChoisissez les tags qui décrivent le mieux ce site web
Logiciels malveillants ou virus
Mauvais service client
Hameçonnage
Escroquerie
Potentiellement illégal
Fallacieux ou contraire à l’éthique
Risques relatifs à la confidentialité
Suspect
Haine, discrimination
Escroquerie
Programme potentiellement indésirable
Publicités / fenêtres pop-up
Contenu pour adultes
Nudité accidentelle
Violent ou choquant
Annuler
Publier le commentaire
1.1
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star

Basé sur 12 avis

Classer par :
Le plus récent
Promotes dangerous pseudo-science (e.g. myths about fluoride, vaccines, chelation products, etc.). A thorough debunking can be found (among other places) in Paul Offit's books "Do You Believe in Magic" and "Bad Faith."
2
Sure, it may be anti-vaccine, but that doesn't mean it is untrustworthy. Do your research people and allow others to do the same. Not all vaccines are necessary. Follow the money, and see where you end up.
Utile
I think this site and accompanying article have been marked as untrustworthy only because the content is contrary to popular opinion of pro-choice. The question whether this article is suitable for children is not exactly relevant, as young children that might be bothered by the subject matter would probably not follow it anyway, as it is written for a higher grade-level of reading comprehension. Just because the subject matter discusses some difficult topics such as realities of abortion, doesn't mean the website is unsafe. The article does not cause anything to happen when you click on it that any other website does, and does not redirect you to other sites. I think it is wrong for people to use WOT to target a website as bad, simply because they disagree with the content. This is still supposed to be a FREE INTERNET where people are entitled to their opinions, and WOT should not be used to censor those of a contrary opinion.
1
I found the article on measles from a non-vaccing parent quite informative, and since I'm familiar with much of the science on this issue, I was not taken aback. I have a feeling the negative reviews of the site are more "political" (trying to squelch non-mainstream views) than they are substantive, but that's just a suspicion.
3
This is a safe site to visit. No malware, or spyware. This is a great site. Great site for natural health, whole living.
2
There is nothing wrong with this site. There are no drive by downloads, no viruses, no spam, no malware, no deceptive marketing. Please stop using WOT as a tool to censor information you don't agree with. That is not it's purpose!
3
This site is well-written and contains valid opinion. It is being unfairly "red-listed" by people abusing WOT in an attempt to scare readers away from opinions with which they disagree... or perhaps are being paid to slander. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: WOT should be used the way I believe it was intended: to protect users from computer viruses, worms, & such, as well as to protect them from accidentally accessing pornographic material. IT SHOULD NOT BE USED TO CENSOR OPINION OR TO DISCOURAGE PEOPLE FROM READING THE WIDEST POSSIBLE RANGE OF OPINION. You pro-vaxxers who are behind this campaign to censor sites that you happen to disagree with - or are being paid to slander - should be ashamed of yourselves.
5
It mainly pushes junk-science and false claims, basically, do not believe anything they say.
6
This site is a direct threat to your life. Following advice given on this page increases your risk of serious illness and death.
5
Anti-vaccination propaganda. NO, there is zero link between vaccinations and autism. There is massive correlation between not being vaccinated and long lasting health damage, even death. Not vaccinating your children is child abuse. Telling others not to is accessory in child abuse. Also other unscientific rubbish like raw food (are they really trying to kill themselves?!?) Unashamedly spreads literal lies about health and food. I'm sure she believes it, but they are still lies.
5
This site promotes anti science, pro disease retoric
10
This site provides dangerously unscientific advice on health issues, particularly in relation to vaccination. If the advice is followed, it will lead to possible infant deaths, as very young children cannot be immunised against life-threatening diseases such as polio and pertussis.
9
Vérifiez si vous avez été compromisConnectez-vous à Google pour analyser votre historique de navigation.
Se connecter avec Google
Tel que vu sur
En vous connectant, vous acceptez la collecte et l'utilisation des données telles qu'elles sont décrites dans notre site web. Conditions d'utilisation et Politique de Confidentialité
alternative-placeholder

À propos de WOT

Nous avons passé en revue plus de 2 millions de sites web et ce n'est pas fini. WOT est une extension légère conçue pour vous aider à naviguer rapidement et en toute sécurité. Il nettoie votre navigateur, l'accélère et protège vos informations privées.

C'est votre site ?

Réclamez votre site web pour accéder aux outils commerciaux de WOT et entrer en contact avec vos clients.
Réclamer ce site
Ce site utilise des cookies à des fins d'analyse et de personnalisation. En continuant, vous acceptez notre politique en matière de cookies.
Accepter