This site contains fraudulent and dangerously misleading information as seen in the following example:
Do not read or support this site.
A generally good unashamedly left-leaning news outlet; content is typically factually correct but makes bias by omission of counterpoints or other stories.
Essentially it is what it is; it's no purveyor of fake news, but you have to use your own judgement in deciding if your news mix is as balanced as it could be.
The main negative points against the site are an increasing number of click-baity "shock" articles that lower the tone, and an online comments section that is dominated by a handful of right-wing trolls against whom no action ever appears to be taken.
It appears to be an electronically safe website, however though the news may be legitimate, it appears to have a lot of shocking and morbid content that would not be suitable for children at all. Be warned.
Fake/Hoax News sites are satire sites that are not funny. They are an attempt to play on gullible people who do not check sources and will just pass the news on as if it were really true.
News about Facebook offers a job buy kit $99 to start to work SCAM FRAUD. Check the link
Сайт имеет оплаченный правительством Англии материал, содержит лживую информацию, разжигает расовую неприязнь, пропагандирует проституцию и педофилию.
Сайт классифицируется категориями WOT! -- как не приемлемый для просмотра.
"Britain's naughtiest pets make the WOOFEST housemates - causing damage worth £1.2 BILLION"
Okay, so there's clickbait and then there's just LYING.
You can call it "cheeky wording", but it's just plain lying, no matter how you dress it.
Stick with click bait, don't ****ing lie.
I would call this site fine as far as computer harm is concerned. As for the content it's full of everything from unflinching videos to completely fascinating well thought out articles good news worthy ones, others are tacky, and others are downright awful shocking and despicable. The site is very open ended with what they show, many videos come from many different sites and many are too hard for children, I said Gruesome or shocking as my negative (only because wot only allows that to be a negative) but I don't really feel that gruesome or shocking is always negative but I do feel it needs that description. On the other hand I called it a good site because it's generally not trying to shock just to get a rise, is generally well informed and actually has actual articles that describe, and give detail about the people in the videos. If this was just a shock site they would just show horrible videos and not give any real literature.