Le site mywot.com est-il sûr ?

The irony of this site (mywot.com), the company that runs it and its "power users" is quite amusing. mywot.com whois is private hxxps://i.imgur.com/ZYj8Cwb.png they sell data and entire web histories of their browser addon users hxxps://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/aug/01/data-browsing-habits-brokers hxxps://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/seamonkey/addon/wot-safe-browsing-tool/reviews/ Best practices for commenting Comments should be descriptive and give at least one reason. “Good site” is not a good comment. Scorecard comments are not a place to share general opinions about a topic, and should be strictly about your own experience with the website. Do not post links to competitors or similar websites in your comment. Keep your comments brief and to the point. Try not to recycle the same comments for multiple websites, as each should describe the commented site as well as possible Typical behavior of so called "power users" Recycled Comments much? You spam just as much as the websites you comment on! https://www.mywot.com/en/user/804814/comments hxxps://imgur.com/a/hu078 Even more disturbing is that companies such as facebook use the api of this company to censor "suspect" websites based on this communities "opinion" of said websites. Laughable, really. They implement no detection technology at all to investigate claims of users. Many negative reviews provide no factual information just some persons assumptions and or rants. People here claim to advocate privacy and security when the company they are advocating for (mywot) is completely doing the opposite in the background hidden by a vague non transparent privacy policy. This platform has potential but needs to be redone from the ground up including the current scorecard rating as overall they are tainted and inaccurate. Unlike most so call "reviews" on this site here is actual proof from credible sources. References: hxxps://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/aug/01/data-browsing-habits-brokers hxxps://blocked.cdn.mozilla.net/i1523.html hxxps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12870953 hxxps://www.pcmag.com/news/349328/web-of-trust-browser-extension-cannot-be-trusted hxxps://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/mozilla-firefox-disables-wot-add-on/

I’m not sure so far. I had to help my sis with an assignment for her writing course. I signed up, ordered the paper, and got a few responses from the writer. I think I chose a good writer. In the end I didn’t need the paper, and I had to cancel the order. The writer offered me a full refund. Nice attitude. If I ever need such services again, I think I’ll try that writer.

I feel I "cannot" trust WOT's recommendations about websites anymore. Example twitter.com is safe but a user account on twitter is not? WOT allows anyone to rate a site so WOT's recommendations may or may not be valid. People are abusing this to try to shut sites and pages down. I DID NOT SIGN UP FOR WOT TO CENSOR FREE SPEECH. One fix may be to lower the weight of a negative review when it's obvious by comments people disagree with the negative review that is creating a poor rating.