Le site nytimes.com est-il sûr ?

La confiance de WOT

Score de sécurité du site web

89%
Le score de sécurité de WOT est basé sur notre technologie unique et sur les avis des experts de la communauté.
Ce site est-il revendiqué ?
Non
Avis de la Communauté
★ 4.7
L'algorithme de WOT
93%
Sécurité pour les Enfants
93%

Que dit la communauté ?

Laisser un commentaire

Quelle note entre 1 et 5 donneriez-vous à ce site ?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Faites part de vos commentaires et aidez la communautéLes commentaires doivent comporter au moins 15 caractèresChoisissez les tags qui décrivent le mieux ce site web
Logiciels malveillants ou virus
Mauvais service client
Hameçonnage
Escroquerie
Potentiellement illégal
Fallacieux ou contraire à l’éthique
Risques relatifs à la confidentialité
Suspect
Haine, discrimination
Escroquerie
Programme potentiellement indésirable
Publicités / fenêtres pop-up
Contenu pour adultes
Nudité accidentelle
Violent ou choquant
Annuler
Publier le commentaire
4.7
starstarstarstarhalf-star

Basé sur 319 avis

Classer par :
Le plus récent
нормальный развлекательный ресурс, но редко пользуюсь им
Utile
I like the purpose of RE!fundbacknet it’s a good one and people can make use of it
Utile
the always have some agenda i dont like it
Utile
For sure, I know that this company don`t need to bother me, because I'm living in another country. But, lemme tell you one thing, NY times isn`t worth calling themselves an unbiased news agency. Maybe, I dunno the real things, cuz I`m an insider or sort of, but from the third party side, it looks absolutely foolish. I know something about politics and can claim that some news companies are bribed to use their communication channels for sympathizing with a certain party. How it`s possible to trust them and their broadcast information after that, even though they reach promptly.
Utile
I think everyone enjoys reading the NYtimes. This is simply the pinnacle of the news industry. There are absolutely zero issues with their website.
Utile
Had to stop reading it. It is written for an audience with one political view. It does not make an effort to present both sides.
Utile
Don't want to claim that New york times are the best medium out there, but it's definitely better than other medium like the Guardian. Abundance of topics makes me binge-read articles, get essential information and absorb it, like... to understand where I can potentially apply receive knowledge and this is inspiring for real. Some people prefer reading books to get knowledge, others, like myself, prefer to read newspapers and various articles from experts of the industry. IDK, for me th latter approach is better.
Utile
нормальный развлекательный ресурс
Utile
American newspaper website.
Utile
safe site. International news but tons of propaganda
Utile
Читаю почти каждый день,новости тут хорошие
Utile
I think everyone enjoys reading the NYtimes. This is simply the pinnacle of the news industry. There are absolutely zero issues with their website.
Utile
Driving is misleading and without information, they masterfully write fake news.
1
газета номер один для меня. каждый раз читаю с большим удовольствием
Utile
One of the main newspaper for me. Subscribed for 5 years already.
Utile
Posting true news. If you are writer then you can get chance to post your opinion.
Utile
Вполне не плохой сайт, абсолютно безопасен
Utile
I used to have a better opinion of this site until the recent (2016) demonstration of editorial bias that has eclipsed their role as reporting news and put them squarely into the role of attempting to create news and shape public opinion for the sake of a political agenda (the blatant campaigning for Hilary Clinton and subsequent demeaning reportage of Senator Sanders). As it is, this paper is now more in the mold of a Hearst-style, dynastic mouthpiece for special interests, thus is not an unbiased source of news. Editorial oversight is problematic in that reporting on current events is too often tainted with issues of libel and character assassination, for example, the initial reporting on Alec Baldwin's involvement in a fatal on-set shooting with an alleged prop-gun which pointedly described Baldwin's previous unrelated encounters with the police. Article comments are not just heavily moderated, the editors selectively pick comments from a select group of commentors who are a de facto part of the NY Times editorial oversight while ignoring other comments or deleting them hours after being posted. This site uses an aggressive paywall as well. Much of the reporting is still of higher quality than many papers, only one should read it carefully and be aware of these problems regarding bias.
1
12345
...
16
Vérifiez si vous avez été compromisConnectez-vous à Google pour analyser votre historique de navigation.
Se connecter avec Google
Tel que vu sur
En vous connectant, vous acceptez la collecte et l'utilisation des données telles qu'elles sont décrites dans notre site web. Conditions d'utilisation et Politique de Confidentialité
alternative-placeholder

À propos de WOT

Nous avons passé en revue plus de 2 millions de sites web et ce n'est pas fini. WOT est une extension légère conçue pour vous aider à naviguer rapidement et en toute sécurité. Il nettoie votre navigateur, l'accélère et protège vos informations privées.

C'est votre site ?

Réclamez votre site web pour accéder aux outils commerciaux de WOT et entrer en contact avec vos clients.
Réclamer ce site
Ce site utilise des cookies à des fins d'analyse et de personnalisation. En continuant, vous acceptez notre politique en matière de cookies.
Accepter