Le site rationalwiki.org est-il sûr ?

La confiance de WOT

Score de sécurité du site web

Le score de sécurité de WOT est basé sur notre technologie unique et sur les avis des experts de la communauté.
Ce site est-il revendiqué ?
Avis de la Communauté
★ 4.4
L'algorithme de WOT
Sécurité pour les Enfants

Que dit la communauté ?

Laisser un commentaire

Quelle note entre 1 et 5 donneriez-vous à ce site ?
Faites part de vos commentaires et aidez la communautéLes commentaires doivent comporter au moins 15 caractèresChoisissez les tags qui décrivent le mieux ce site web
Logiciels malveillants ou virus
Mauvais service client
Potentiellement illégal
Fallacieux ou contraire à l’éthique
Risques relatifs à la confidentialité
Haine, discrimination
Programme potentiellement indésirable
Publicités / fenêtres pop-up
Contenu pour adultes
Nudité accidentelle
Violent ou choquant
Publier le commentaire

Basé sur 74 avis

Classer par :
Le plus récent
Hateful leftist equivalent of a third reich nazi page
Just a bag full of lies & propaganda
Community site full of terrible hate and adult content
Not bad, but it does seems to have a leftist slant sometimes to its detriment
Not a reliable site for TRUTH. openly chides true Christianity, not understanding Scripture because it has not been revealed to them by GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT.
rationalwiki.org berichtet einseitig atheistisch. Argumente der Gegenseite werden komplett unterschlagen!
They seem to have nothing good to say about anyone. It's just a raunchy humor site, I guess. At least, I'm certain they find the site funny. It's all insult humor. To each his own.
Dismantles the cranks. Warning, may contain sarcasm.
Great anti-pseudoscience, anti-quackery, anti-authoritarianism resource! Rational Wiki is slightly biased pro-left no doubt. There are, however, some articles that do criticize the left or other people besides just white conservatives: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antifascist_Action#Internal_divisions https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch#Motte_and_bailey https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Black_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Female_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Hard_green https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moralistic_fallacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shoehorning#Politics https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_media_platforms#Tumblr https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center#Criticism RW does have fair share of opinion crept in, though, ought to be noted. Thankfully, like Wikipedia, there sometimes is the "Citation needed" -note in place where a citation hasn't been added. Oftentimes citations can be found. Sections on logical arguments are gold! Recommended alongside many other sources.
With the pervasiveness of misinformation, half truths and outright lies to be found in social media it is absolutely necessary that sites like this exist to inform and educate and to foster critical thinking.
Not exactly the most accurate, but very entertaining.
Site satirique combattant diverses pseudosciences. Ne cache pas ses prise de position.
This is a good and useful site since it promotes rational thought and helps debunks some of the more pernicious lies, disinformation campaigns and other poison that can be found on the internet. I would consider this child-friendly as well since one would want their children to be wise and think for themselves.
This website is run by feminists, which means that everything in this article is biased against male. Use this site for humor only.
Some language (e.g., bulls--t). View it before your kids do.
Worst of the worst regressive left propaganda. Site even promotes pedophilia. Sick fucks. Not safe for children at all.
Whether it is a joke or somebody actually believes crazy stuff they write on this site, it should be marked as such instead of masquerading as a wikipedia-type page.
I'll start with an edited tweet by Anita Sarkeesian. ***** Metapedia has poor ratings because it's (at least it seems to be) a Neo-nazi wiki. Rationalwiki may not take itself seriously, but it deserves to be treated equally to its slightly less rational counterparts.
Very informative, covers the main areas of pseudoscience (religious or otherwise), conspiracy theories and alien-spotting. Calls a spade a spade.
No viruses or any other sort. However, it is terribly biased towards third wave feminism/atheism : "Christina Hoff Sommers (born 1950) is a self-declared feminist" http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Christina_Hoff_Sommers -Note the word "self-declared" Questionable use of language and is also a for-atheism site. I am not religious, but Wikipedia is a better source of unbiased information than this site. TL;DR Website is safe, information is slightly biased
Vérifiez si vous avez été compromisConnectez-vous à Google pour analyser votre historique de navigation.
Se connecter avec Google
Tel que vu sur
En vous connectant, vous acceptez la collecte et l'utilisation des données telles qu'elles sont décrites dans notre site web. Conditions d'utilisation et Politique de Confidentialité

À propos de WOT

Nous avons passé en revue plus de 2 millions de sites web et ce n'est pas fini. WOT est une extension légère conçue pour vous aider à naviguer rapidement et en toute sécurité. Il nettoie votre navigateur, l'accélère et protège vos informations privées.

C'est votre site ?

Réclamez votre site web pour accéder aux outils commerciaux de WOT et entrer en contact avec vos clients.
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy