Le site rationalwiki.org est-il sûr ?

RationalWiki is a satirical, half-serious website with a clear secular, liberal slant. A lot of the articles therein are biased and censorious, especially those dealing with religion or the opposing party. Having said that, the site is admittedly more credible than its egregious theoconservative counterpart, Conservapedia. Whereas the latter is serious and self-righteous in its delusions, it seems like this site at least understands that it is reporting along partisan lines. Naturally, I'd recommend Wikipedia for credible information on any and all topics. RationalWiki caters to a particular point of view, and its credibility is dubious at best. Remember that this wiki is MEANT to be biased, so don't go in expecting a neutral reporting of events.

This website is a wiki-based website about topics pertaining to religion, politics, and science. It is written from an atheistic, liberal point of view; this means that the way one takes this website depends heavily on their views. As with any website that talks about hot-buttoned topics, this website is not always child friendly.

This is the most negative, condescending, and blatantly biased website I have ever visited. The authors are openly racist, sexist, and prejudiced against all people groups, religions, and traditions. It is a very disappointing read if you have an even remotely open mind. Have any of the authors heard of giving others the benefit of the doubt? According to these authors, everyone who doesn't hold a perfectly cynical, leftist, and atheistic view of the world is an idiot, and anyone who is white or religious is evil. I can only imagine the number of Facebook friends who have blocked these angry atheists from their feed. Do yourself a favor and avoid this site's toxic negativity. Included below is just one example of many from the site of blatant racism, sexism, and prejudice, via a web archive, lest the authors attempt to delete it. https://archive.today/IcUlX "basically anyone who can't afford seven-figure bribes or isn't white, male, and psychotically religious." "Today, the Democratic Party attracts academia, white-collar professionals,[14] scientists,[15] medical students,[16] the youth vote,[17] the working class,[18] increasingly the middle class,[19] consumer advocates, copyright reformers, women,[20] LGBT, ethnic minorities, basically anyone who can't afford seven-figure bribes or isn't white, male, and psychotically religious. Considering the very nature of the Republican Party, this is not that surprising, and the Democrats don't really need to do much to court their vote."