Le site sepp.org est-il sûr ?
La confiance de WOT
Score de sécurité du site web
33%
Ce site est-il revendiqué ?
Non
Avis de la Communauté
★ 1.9
L'algorithme de WOT
39%
Sécurité pour les Enfants
N/A
Que dit la communauté ?
Laisser un commentaire
Faites part de vos commentaires et aidez la communautéLes commentaires doivent comporter au moins 15 caractèresChoisissez les tags qui décrivent le mieux ce site web
Logiciels malveillants ou virus
Mauvais service client
Hameçonnage
Escroquerie
Potentiellement illégal
Fallacieux ou contraire à l’éthique
Risques relatifs à la confidentialité
Suspect
Haine, discrimination
Escroquerie
Programme potentiellement indésirable
Publicités / fenêtres pop-up
Contenu pour adultes
Nudité accidentelle
Violent ou choquant
Annuler
Publier le commentaire
1.9
Basé sur 10 avis
Classer par :
Le plus récent
This site and organization are a deliberate attempt by corrupted scientists and a tobacco PR firm to advance the false notion that climate change is not really occurring or that it is not driven by monied interests.
See: *****
Utile
The site provides accurate, detailed and well supported assessments of climate science.
Utile
The only reason sepp is Woted is because so many of those people pushing the global warming scare are sufficiently unethical to deliberately silence their opponents- as opposed to engaging in open debate.
Utile
Disregard any WOT rating on sites not sharing the ideology of anthropogenic climate warming. WOT has been taken over by global warming fundamentalists and the WOT admins seems not to care... WOT should not be involved with value/expert judgements, but with factual dangers that sites pose to one's computer...
1
The weekly summary of news on this site, critical of the official UN's IPCC politicised and dogmatic approach to climate science, is factual. Some might not like the message, but that gives them no right to try and deny free speech.
2
I am weary of having radical environmentalists claim that sites with which they disagree are providing inaccurate or misleading information. The subject of catastrophic global warming is among the most controversial of all environmental issues. This site provides reasoned and accurate analysis of data and provides a valuable counter point to the sometimes inaccurate and overstated conclusions of the IPCC. I wish that the radicals would quit lying; I think that they would if they realized that by lying they are sacrificing their credibility.
2
Leftists hate the real science reported here - they prefer junk science to support their economic and political agendas.
2
WOT should not be used for political reasons by left wing agitators. This site provides a sceptical response to the orthodoxy of left wing politicised science.
5
In 1990, they were claiming that asbestos is safe, pesticides are safe and there is no problem with ozone layer...
It is not a reliable source of information.
5
Hello All,
These are some sites that present the other side of the global warming argument.. That it is essentially a big scam etc..
3
Vérifiez si vous avez été compromisConnectez-vous à Google pour analyser votre historique de navigation.En vous connectant, vous acceptez la collecte et l'utilisation des données telles qu'elles sont décrites dans notre site web. Conditions d'utilisation et Politique de Confidentialité
Se connecter avec Google
Tel que vu sur
À propos de WOT
Nous avons passé en revue plus de 2 millions de sites web et ce n'est pas fini. WOT est une extension légère conçue pour vous aider à naviguer rapidement et en toute sécurité. Il nettoie votre navigateur, l'accélère et protège vos informations privées.C'est votre site ?
Réclamez votre site web pour accéder aux outils commerciaux de WOT et entrer en contact avec vos clients.Réclamer ce site
Installer WOTCe site utilise des cookies à des fins d'analyse et de personnalisation. En continuant, vous acceptez notre politique en matière de cookies.
Accepter