Le site smh.com.au est-il sûr ?

Mindless sensationalist garbage. Light on facts, heavy on appeal to emotion fallacies and loaded wordings. No different than any other 'news' source. Article in question: http://www.smh.com.au/world/great-day-for-mass-murderers-as-gun-control-measures-rejected-by-us-senate-20160621-gpo3l3.html

Gerson "therapy" has been shown to be fraudulent by real doctors posting at ***** The fact that some people recover from cancer spontaneously is well known. The only way to know if a "therapy" works or not is to test it with a double blind controlled clinical trial where neither the patients nor the doctors administering the proposed therapy know who is getting it and who is not. Then statistics will show whether the group getting the treatment has a significantly higher cure/remission rate than the group which is getting placebo "treatment". In the case of gerson therapy, the results of these trials have shown that it is useless. It is irresponsible for sites like this to promote "therapies" which are not helpful. Steve Jobs is just one of many victims of such "therapies". He might well be alive today had he sought the advice of real doctors who actually took the 10 years or so of intensive training to become experts in these subjects.

Great news and informations website that is based in Australia, however they have those annoying adverts that sometimes causes my browser to crash. Not sure if that is due to plug-ins I have installed on FF, but apart from that I browse this site quite often to keep updated about what goes on Down Under.