Le site upledger.com est-il sûr ?

WOT needs to split trustworthiness into two categories - one for web safety(troans, viruses, spyware) etc and one for content. The ratings as they are now set up are becoming pretty useless. One can be scared from perfectly safe sites simply because some people disagree with wht is beiing said. Extrapolate that and everything will be rated poorly by persons by one point of view or another. And why is my rating saying "I havent rated when I checked "I trust" on the bar?

PuddinTame is absolutely correct. "Craniosacral Therapy" is garbage science and an outright scam. Come on, folks, just look at their alleged explanations for how their con works. ***** Seriously, READ that juvenile foolishness. After that, do some basic research. Where? Try these links ... ***** ***** The Craniosacral Osteopaths are shameless, but, after all, fraud pays. NOTE: Sure, if you want to waste money on such "treatments" for yourself, go ahead. A fool and his money are soon parted. HOWEVER, Upledger is now doing his "manipulations" on the skulls of infants, and he is claiming that he gets their "informed consent" before doing his woo, because (he claims) infants understand language. Meddling with the skull of an infant IS dangerous! That's not a matter of opinion, it is a fact.

THIS IS NOT A SPYWARE-PHISHING OR OTHERWISE EVIL SITE, the diagnosis I THOUGHT W.0.T. WAS TO BE USED FOR. I would actually have given an 'Interesting' category or neutral, but am irritated to find that it is judged 'unsafe' by the thought police. It is the 21st century, and we have come full circle in civilization to censorship for everything but sex and violence. To use WOT for subjective judgements is to ruin the usefulness of the site. If I want to do research, it is becoming impossible to know whether a site is 'safe' for my computer or just deemed 'unethical' by the thought police. Those who are merely interested in censorship should get their own website or judge a site neutral to post their nanny-like opinions.

CranioSacral Therapy (CST) is the main treatment method espoused by this site, despite being a mostly discredited form of therapy: ***** "Craniosacral therapy lacks any meaningful mainstream support and its base premises have been characterised as "fanciful"[26]" The site goes on to claim CST was 'invented and pioneered' by Upledger between ***** when it's obvious these techniques were drawn from earlier sources such as Sutherland, Still, et al. Normally I'd just file this under the normal chiropractry scam (useless), but this version of CST has a heavy emphasis on vulnerable members, including infants and the elderly, which makes it Ethical Issue to me.