Le site vaxtruth.org est-il sûr ?

Vaxtruth provides good science on the "other side" of the vaccine debate. For people to be able to decide what medical procedures are right for them or their children, there needs to be balanced and complete information about risks, side effects, and safety. Vaxtruth provides what the CDC, FDA, other health agencies, and your doctor/pharmacist do not. For instance, when others just cite the "minimal risk for vaccine injuries" and adverse events, vaxtruth delves into the latest information on which ingredients pose what problems for specific at-risk individuals. Too bad our government can't seem to do the same!

VaxTruth presents well-researched articles with much of the content coming from the published medical literature. All one has to do is read the posts and click the links to verify this. Those who benefit from the sale and uptake of vaccines do not want the public to have access to information that is counter to their own financial interests. They are using WOT to discourage people from seeking information they need in order to make the most accurate cost-benefit analyses regarding medical decisions for themselves and for their children. The negative ratings are not about the safety of the site; they are about censorship. Plain and simple.

I find the information on this site to be high quality. I have never had a problem with malware or cookies. The spewing negative reviews seem to be a misuse of WOT's purpose, which is to protect users from sites that will negatively affect their computers. If you disagree with the well-cited, intelligently analyzed information, go hang out on the biggest propaganda site of all--the CDC website.

I learned a lot from visiting this site. There are a lot of factually-suppported questions and information glossed over by mainstream medicine and mainstream press. I also find it very disturbing that industry employees are directed to come here and abuse the mywot system in order to try to censor sites like vaxtruth. Censoring those who question industry or even government goes against everything this country stands for! Thank you very much, but I'll examine the points raised by both sides and decide for myself, and not assume that industry salesmen are going to tell me the whole truth.

Big pharma shills leaving "reviews". Hmmm. Typical. You can choose to remain as you are or you can wake up, it's entirely up to you. Those of us dealing with DIAGNOSED VACCINE INJURY, yes, by a real, actual DOCTOR are entitled (not to mention forced) to feel differently. These things happened to our children because of going along with the "rules", not in spite of them. Really try and THINK about that for a moment.

Biased opinions about herd immunity. Piper-Terry (who runs the site) has argued, echoing the argumentum ad Brady Bunchium, that measles is not harmful and that measles is even good for you. Piper-Terry even cites an abstract from a fundamentalist Catholic scientist named Theresa Deisher, who through her Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute (SCPI), has been trying to prove that DNA from “aborted fetuses” in vaccines is responsible for autism through its ability to recombine with the infant’s DNA. Particularly despicable in Piper-Terry’s post is how she zeroes in on 450 people dying each year of the measles in the US in the years before the vaccine was licensed dividing by the entire US population of 189 million at the time, and concluding that only 0.000237% of the US population died of the measles each year. In fact, in the post referenced by Piper-Terry entitled “Putting Measles Into Perspective“, her friend Dawn Babcock Papple even asks rhetorically about the number of people dying of the measles world-wide, “When over 150,000 people die each day total, is 540 people dying of measles each day really that outrageous?” - Posted by David Gorski on January 19, 2015