Le site wikipedia.org est-il sûr ?

Considéré comme sûr par WOT

4.7
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(603 avis)
Bon site
Opinions, religion, politique
Autre
Médecine alternative ou controversée
Je détiens ce site
Demander à notre communauté
Partager :

wikipedia.org

4.7
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(603 avis)
Protégez votre smartphone
1. Recevez des alertes en cas de site Web dangereux.
2. Bloquez le contenu pour adultes.
3. Restez en sécurité lors de vos déplacements.
Partagez votre avis...
starempty-star
Mauvais
starempty-star
Correct
starempty-star
Moyen
starempty-star
Bon
starempty-star
Excellent
603 avis dans la communauté
Classer par :
Le plus récent
8 août 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Тут будет коротко и ясно. Что не знаю - иду сюда! И этим все сказано.
Utile
3 août 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Каждый день вспоминается какая то дребедень , то как что устроено, то про птиц, то про зверей, то про всяких там людей. Все найдется в этом сайте. Энциклопедия просто огромнейшая . Найдется все и про все , даже про то что ни когда и не слышал можно там откопать что то интересное . Дизайн простой и понятный. Не глюков не тормозов. Захожу на этот сайт практически каждый день .
Utile
29 juil. 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Единственная и лучшая интернет-энциклопедия. Всегда проверяю какие-то факты только здесь.
Utile
26 juin 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Great website for learning just about anything you need to know.
Utile
26 juin 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Very popular online respository of knowledge. One thing to note, best to double check details from reputable sources if doing a research paper though.
Utile
26 juin 2020
starstarstarstarempty-star
Perhaps the best website in the world right now.
Utile
22 juin 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Как же мне жалко википедию! ЛЮБЛЮ ЕЁ
Utile
8 juin 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Perhaps the best website in the world right now.
Utile
starstarstarstarstar
Множно найти много нужной и полезной информации)
Utile
1 juin 2020
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
Wikipedia reverses the original idea of an encyclopedia: No longer are individual experts alone publishing their knowledge, but a production community of many. In doing so, it feels committed to the neutral presentation of world knowledge, and consciously not to the evaluation of the same. Thanks to the collaborative working method, there are now over 2 million articles in the German-language Wikipedia, which is more than Brockhaus covers. In total there are almost 300 language versions. The principle underlying Wikipedia is simple: Any user can edit, improve or even add articles in Wikipedia. However, only edits that have been approved by experienced authors are retained. The operators of Wikipedia (the Wikimedia Foundation) generally do not intervene in the "ongoing operation" and instead rely on the self-organisation of the Wikipedia community. Because everyone has the opportunity to participate in Wikipedia, there are complex rules and roles without which the community could not function and the quality of articles could not be guaranteed. It is important that these rules are followed so that everyone can contribute within their own capabilities. Active authors gain more skills the longer they are involved and the more edits they make to articles. So-called classifiers take on the largest share of all administrative tasks. Their typical tasks include the removal of vandalism, the viewing of content - with the right to check contributions from others in order to either release or discard them - , the administration of archives, the holding of deletion discussions, etc. The openness of Wikipedia also brings with it vandalism, which in Wikipedia is taken to mean deliberately inserted inappropriate content. Wikipedia authors with viewer status take on the thankless task of eliminating this vandalism. The original texts are usually restored within minutes. The special nature of the way Wikipedia is created makes it a never-ending project that is constantly being improved, expanded and updated. To ensure that the quality of Wikipedia does not suffer as a result of the participation of many, authors are subject to the rules mentioned above. With a few tips and a little experience, it is possible to learn to correctly evaluate the quality of Wikipedia articles, because even within Wikipedia there are differences in quality. It is therefore necessary to be able to judge for yourself how reliable the articles there are. Under "How to recognize a good Wikipedia article", for example, relevant clues are suggested. Basically, Wikipedia is a good starting point for research work, but should not be the only and last source to be accessed and quoted on a topic. When citing, it is generally recommended to refer to primary rather than secondary sources, the latter including Wikipedia.
Utile
31 mai 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Русская из СНГ лучше всех как по мне !
Utile
11 mai 2020
starstarstarstarstar
The most useful website on the internet.
Utile
24 avr. 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Отличный сайт но по регионам очень отличается... одна и та же инфа на русской вике и на украинской - могут отличаться
Utile
5 avr. 2020
starstarstarstarstar
very good website
Utile
23 mars 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Отличный справочный сайт.
Utile
22 mars 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Fantastic website which have answers to all of the questions out there, you really can buy and get all what you want with that thing absolutely. Every your issue already covered here in a very detailed way entirely and completely.
Utile
starstarstarstarstar
ООООчень хороший справочный материал , на все вопросы есть ответы ,хороший источник материала .
Utile
14 févr. 2020
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
anyone can edit it, and is notorious for having false information.
Utile
1 févr. 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Самая большая база со справочными материалами, которую я встречал в сети Интернет. Пульзуюсь ей регулярно.
Utile
25 janv. 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Each and everything on the website wikipedia.
Utile
«
123
...
31
»

À propos de ce site

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

Indice de Confiance
94
/100
Sécurité pour les Enfants
94
/100