allaboutscience.orgは安全ですか？

There is nothing wrong with this site. It outlines and explains science as it is. Not the stupid atheistic evolutionist nonsense so many people so stubbornly believe which they call science but it's actually not. God bless the authors of this website. Thank you for wonderful source of information.

This site is trustworthy. It is not dangerous, indecent, or unsafe for children. As per the WOT rating system, it does not fall under: - Suspicious - Hate, discrimination - Spam - Ads / pop-ups - Malware or viruses - Poor Customer experience - Phishing - Scam - Adult content - Gruesome or shocking The closest you could see it as being is "Misleading claims or unethical", yet it is closer to a Positive or Neutral rating of "Opinions, religion, poloitics". In no way is this website going to comprimise your security or safety. It is not extremist or dangerous for children. Because it is an opinion other WOT users do not agree with, they have rated it as having a poor reputation, which is not accurate. It's down to opinion. WOT is not a rating system open to opinion.

Creationists and Evolutionists use the same data and evidence and come to different conclusions. Evolutionists would rather shut the site down than deal with the arguments. It is an abuse of the WOT system to mark a site as dangerous because you don't like what it says. Long Live Freedom of Speech.

Here’s a direct quote from the site: 'However, the First Law of Thermodynamics shows us that nothing in the physical universe can create or destroy that matter or energy. If nothing natural can create matter or energy, then something supernatural must have created them.' That isn’t science. That’s Creationism, a.k.a. Intelligent Design. This site has severe ethical problems. It’s not, as advertised, 'All about Science,' it’s all about their religious interpretations.

I see people rating based completely on the fact that they disagree with the views presented. True science is suppose to be about considering all possibilities, not embracing one because you don't like the implications of the alternative. Seems many people do not understand the rating system and use it to censor that which they themselves do not agree with.

More questionable than hateful... The website is full of logical inconsistencies and misinformation. It directly challenges arguments that have been tested and proven without offering evidence to the contrary. While I have no issues with it arguing matters of a more philosophical nature, it would be appreciated if it started with a neutral standpoint and came to a logical conclusion, rather than forcing it's own views on the reader.

The "science" presented here is not subject to peer review, nor would it hold up against it. Good theories start as testable hypotheses that withstand rigorous experimentation and make predictions that can be further tested. When those predictions hold consistently true, it can be accepted by a consensus of academia as a scientific theory, the definition of which differs significantly from the general definition of theory. Those presented at this website do not hold up to that standard.

I just watched a video there about - Darwin's Theory of Evolution. All I saw in this video was some molecular biologists talking and the all so famous Michael Behe. There was nothing there about the real THEORY of EVOLUTION ! This is just another Creationist site making their fruigtful amount of Red Herrings