This site is filled with lies and misleading propaganda suited for the gullible and religiously credulous. Their claims cherry-pick information and in many cases straight out lie about countless subjects.
This organization is unaccredited because of their unethical practices (as is EVERY single creationist organization). They also do not adhere to scientific methodology. They lie and claim the medical field backs claims of theirs but mention no specific organizations (because they don't exist).
Of all the scientific fields of research, not one of those fields accepts creationism as anything but ludicrous claims from religious fanatics. Note there has been millions of peer-reviewed articles verifying evolution. Also note that there has not once in the history of peer-review ever been one single peer-reviewed article globally that has ever been published supporting creationism. This can be confirmed at Google Scholar, PubMed, and any other scholarly resource.
Nothing wrong with this site. Perfectly alright. Those who said it is not safe are just plain in disagreement with the content, which to me is good. God, creation, the Bible are sound subjects to know and learn. Perfectly OK.
I can only assume that those who give creationstudies.org a bad Trustworthiness score are biased against the idea that the universe came from something other than chaos, in direct violation of the law of entropy. CSI is a trustworthy site that examines scientific evidence from a Christian, not a naturalist, worldview.
There is no reason whatever to claim that this site is (excuse the term, but I'm quoting a prior commentator) "run by fags."
There is no reason to say it is unreliable, nor unsafe for children -- UNLESS one believes that any organization the promotes a plain, simple interpretation of Genesis is "unsafe." Trying to keep children or adults "safe" from hearing evidence on one side of the issue looks pretty unsafe to me!
I wonder about the motivation of the person claiming the site is dangerous and promotes what it stands against. What ax is he grinding?
Sharon Brown Sivertsen, Web Mistress/Librarian, *****
This sight obviously has ideas that are contrary to popular opinion but this does not make it untrustworthy. Of course parents should be aware of what their children are reading but I hardly think this is an unsafe sight.
In this day, there are so many more things to worry about.
This site is very retarded. "In America, the adoption of evolution in our schools has paved the way for the introduction of the gay agenda."
These people are fags.