sepp.orgは安全ですか？
WOT からの信頼
ウェブサイトのセキュリティスコア
33%
このウェブサイトは申請済みですか?
いいえ
コミュニティレビュー
★ 1.9
WOTのアルゴリズム
39%
子供の安全性
該当なし
コミュニティは何と言っていますか?
レビューを残す
フィードバックを共有してコミュニティに貢献しましょうレビューは少なくとも15文字で構成されている必要がありますこのウェブサイトを最もよく表すタグを選択してください
マルウェアあるいはウイルス
顧客サービスが悪い
フィッシング
詐欺
違法の可能性がある
誤解を招くあるいは倫理に反している
プライバシーリスク
不審
憎悪、差別的
スパム
潜在的に迷惑なプログラム
広告/ポップアップ
アダルトコンテンツ
卑猥な可能性がある
残酷あるいは刺激的
キャンセル
レビューの投稿
1.9
10のレビューに基づく
並び順：
最新
This site and organization are a deliberate attempt by corrupted scientists and a tobacco PR firm to advance the false notion that climate change is not really occurring or that it is not driven by monied interests.
See: *****
役立つ
The site provides accurate, detailed and well supported assessments of climate science.
役立つ
The only reason sepp is Woted is because so many of those people pushing the global warming scare are sufficiently unethical to deliberately silence their opponents- as opposed to engaging in open debate.
役立つ
Disregard any WOT rating on sites not sharing the ideology of anthropogenic climate warming. WOT has been taken over by global warming fundamentalists and the WOT admins seems not to care... WOT should not be involved with value/expert judgements, but with factual dangers that sites pose to one's computer...
1
The weekly summary of news on this site, critical of the official UN's IPCC politicised and dogmatic approach to climate science, is factual. Some might not like the message, but that gives them no right to try and deny free speech.
2
I am weary of having radical environmentalists claim that sites with which they disagree are providing inaccurate or misleading information. The subject of catastrophic global warming is among the most controversial of all environmental issues. This site provides reasoned and accurate analysis of data and provides a valuable counter point to the sometimes inaccurate and overstated conclusions of the IPCC. I wish that the radicals would quit lying; I think that they would if they realized that by lying they are sacrificing their credibility.
2
Leftists hate the real science reported here - they prefer junk science to support their economic and political agendas.
2
WOT should not be used for political reasons by left wing agitators. This site provides a sceptical response to the orthodoxy of left wing politicised science.
5
In 1990, they were claiming that asbestos is safe, pesticides are safe and there is no problem with ozone layer...
It is not a reliable source of information.
5
Hello All,
These are some sites that present the other side of the global warming argument.. That it is essentially a big scam etc..
3
WOTをインストールするこのサイトでは分析とパーソナライズのために Cookie を使用しています。 続行すると、当社の クッキーポリシー。
受け入れる