theconservativetreehouse.comは安全ですか?

WOT からの信頼

ウェブサイトのセキュリティスコア

56%
WOT のセキュリティ スコアは、当社独自のテクノロジーとコミュニティの専門家によるレビューに基づいています。
このウェブサイトは申請済みですか?
いいえ
コミュニティレビュー
★ 3.3
WOTのアルゴリズム
65%
子供の安全性
該当なし

コミュニティは何と言っていますか?

レビューを残す

このウェブサイトを1から5の間で、どのように評価しますか?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
フィードバックを共有してコミュニティに貢献しましょうレビューは少なくとも15文字で構成されている必要がありますこのウェブサイトを最もよく表すタグを選択してください
マルウェアあるいはウイルス
顧客サービスが悪い
フィッシング
詐欺
違法の可能性がある
誤解を招くあるいは倫理に反している
プライバシーリスク
不審
憎悪、差別的
スパム
潜在的に迷惑なプログラム
広告/ポップアップ
アダルトコンテンツ
卑猥な可能性がある
残酷あるいは刺激的
キャンセル
レビューの投稿
3.3
starstarstarempty-starempty-star

10のレビューに基づく

並び順:
最新
I agree with the other who reviewed this site with one star. I, too, was a member and simply because I asked a question in regards to Pres. Trump's current stance on abortion after his response was somewhat evasive on the CNN interview, I was cussed out, called names, falsely accused, etc. 'Sundance' (Mark Ivor Bradman), who used to be a Produce mgr. at Publix in FL. before beginning his site, seems to be a bit of an egotist, in my opinion. It's almost as if some of his followers 'worship' him. He can do no wrong and if one questions his opinion, they are barred from his site. His 'Mission Statement' states: '(2) Being intolerant of hate and division.' Yet, when one cusses out another and maligns another, they are rewarded while the focused target of such an assault is blocked. https://www.sitejabber.com/online-business-review?url=theconservativetreehouse.com
役立つ
I am trying to find out exactly who this 'Sundance' is. I had been on his site for 2-3 mos. and then was blocked simply because I very nicely asked if anyone had any current info on Pres. Trump's stance on abortion. I was looking for this info because I had felt that he had been somewhat evasive on this topic on that CNN interview. In response to my question, I was cussed out, called names, falsely accused, etc. I'm a 70 yr. old woman who was simply asking a fairly simple and straightforward question. The attacks were almost vicious. So, what can you tell me about 'Sundance' (Mark)? Is he running some sort of cult? I'm a 'Trump supporter' and have voted for him twice. Yet, because I dared to ask this question, I have now been blocked from that site and my question, I've now discovered, was removed. What's up with this 'MAGA Country' (as one commentator accused me of not understanding) group? If this represents 'MAGA', I want no part of it. UPDATED REVIEW: I agree with the other who reviewed this site with one star. I, too, was a member and simply because I asked a question in regards to Pres. Trump's current stance on abortion after his response was somewhat evasive on the CNN interview, I was cussed out, called names, falsely accused, etc. 'Sundance' (Mark Ivor Bradman), who used to be a Produce mgr. at Publix in FL. before beginning his site, seems to be a bit of an egotist, in my opinion. It's almost as if some of his followers 'worship' him. He can do no wrong and if one questions his opinion, they are barred from his site. His 'Mission Statement' states: '(2) Being intolerant of hate and division.' Yet, when one cusses out another and maligns another, they are rewarded while the focused target of such an assault is blocked. https://www.sitejabber.com/online-business-review?url=theconservativetreehouse.com
役立つ
This site is a source of political disinformation, conspiracy, gossip, rumour and is in no way a valid source of news information – this is a blog. See: ***** ***** ***** Untrustworthy.
役立つ
Great site that provides behind-the-scenes information and analysis that the MSM will NEVER tell you. sundance may be a group of people (or maybe not). But whomever sundance is, he/she provides a perspective that is factual and one that draws insightful conclusions from the facts.
役立つ
This is an insightful website that Leftists desperately seek to discredit. See their hate of the truth in their reviews here. CTH provides thorough analyses of what the Democrat politicians and the Deep State (one and the same) have been doing to us for 60 years in order to destroy our constitutional republic. Because the CTH site provides information and analysis that never show up in the Leftist mainstream media, the negative Leftist reviewers here seek to quash it. Ignore them. If you understand that the New York Times, the Washington Post, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and even much of FoxNews are all advocating Establishment propaganda in order to protect the status quo, so that they can continue to rake in their trillions of dollars at the expense of ordinary working American citizens, then you know to ignore the Leftist reviews here. The Conservative Tree House attempts to reveal what the MSM will not tell you. Read it everyday and you will soon be amazed at how it dissects current events and depicts the massive set of schemes that the Left is foisting upon you and every other American.
役立つ
Everyday the website owner posts the 'Our Father' prayer, but every now and then, the person named 'sundance' every now and then, posts shockingly blasphemous things. Recently, he posted a video of Eric Idle making fun of Jesus's Crucifixion from some terrible movie. He has posted idolatry about President Trump going so far as to rename Christmas, Trumpmas. Do not be fooled by the facade of Christianity the website shows, you will be saddened in time by the shocking blasphemy the owner posts.
2
I have been a subscriber to the site for over 4 years and have never encountered ANY security/spam issues or objectionable subject matter. Whether or not you find the site objectionable may depend on your political opinions. The purpose of WOT is to determine whether or not a site is safe to visit, not whether or not you agree with the information posted. Don't agree, move on.
役立つ
So far I have found the opinions expressed to be in harmony with other news outlets.
3
Its a conservative website, and it appears intolerant liberals are trashing this website on WOT for no other reason than they disagree with the website's conservative content. Any thoughts or opinions that are conservative –– in the eyes of an intolerant liberal –– are deemed distrustful and suspicious.
3
As the name implies, only one side of a story is told. No empirical evidence is provided, and what is provided is "hearsay".
5
侵害されていないか確認するGoogle に接続して閲覧履歴をスキャンします。
Google と接続
掲載されているもの
サインインすることで、当社の定めるデータ収集と使用に同意したことになります。 利用規約 及び 個人情報保護方針
alternative-placeholder

WOT について

私たちは 200 万以上のウェブサイトをレビューしました。 WOT は、迅速かつ安全にブラウジングできるように設計された軽量拡張機能です。 ブラウザをクリーンアップし、速度を上げ、個人情報を保護します。

これはあなたのウェブサイトですか?

ウェブサイトを申請して、WOT のビジネス ツールにアクセスし、顧客とつながりましょう。
このウェブサイトを連携する
このサイトでは分析とパーソナライズのために Cookie を使用しています。 続行すると、当社の クッキーポリシー。
受け入れる