wikipedia.orgは安全ですか？
WOT からの信頼
ウェブサイトのセキュリティスコア
89%
このウェブサイトは申請済みですか?
いいえ
コミュニティレビュー
★ 4.7
WOTのアルゴリズム
94%
子供の安全性
93%
コミュニティは何と言っていますか?
レビューを残す
フィードバックを共有してコミュニティに貢献しましょうレビューは少なくとも15文字で構成されている必要がありますこのウェブサイトを最もよく表すタグを選択してください
マルウェアあるいはウイルス
顧客サービスが悪い
フィッシング
詐欺
違法の可能性がある
誤解を招くあるいは倫理に反している
プライバシーリスク
不審
憎悪、差別的
スパム
潜在的に迷惑なプログラム
広告/ポップアップ
アダルトコンテンツ
卑猥な可能性がある
残酷あるいは刺激的
キャンセル
レビューの投稿
4.7
683のレビューに基づく
並び順：
最新
A Web 2.0 website using bits of information from other web article to make a main profile page for almost any object, idea, person, etc.
5
Children can look up inappropriate stuff.. thats the only downer.
3
Pretty useful... lots of info.
But people should always check the sources...
Verify...
4
A useful and informative site. Adult content easily access and uncensored; as it is a database that is not interested in censorship for the sake of children. Easily edited with false information; however, this rarely happens to high-intelligence-based pages.
3
it is 90% accurate information but it is not going to work for the research paper reference or some information can be too graphic for children
5
not a viable source for information, says it in the disclaimer "WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY"
2
Wikipedia is one of the most important website available on net!
4
Very useful, but not very certain - every user can edit pages.
4
generally good
5
good site but lots of false information. especially in the history section. the german part is also said to be too extreme when filtering out content. english part is said to be "better" according to their openness.
5
banyak informasi yang bagus
4
100% safe, but the information is not always correct
5
absolutely no credibility
1
My primary source of certain kinds of information. Great site.
5
More informations
5
Excellent site. Pure information, no ads.
Would be better if some articles that are not suitable for children were not so easily accessible.
6
This is an excellent site for basic information, but NEVER assume it is 100% accurate. I have caught many cases of extremely inaccurate information and blatant writer bias. Furthermore, some sections read like a gossip column instead of an "encyclopedia." All in all, though, this is great; just use it for what it is--a reservoir of somewhat accurate information and NOT an authoritative source.
4
Awesome site. Probably use this more than any other reference site on the net.
5
Online encyclopedia that anybody can edit. Information on the site isn't always 100% true, but what can be expected?
5
Excelent, very useful, thanks
4
2627282930
...
35
WOTをインストールするこのサイトでは分析とパーソナライズのために Cookie を使用しています。 続行すると、当社の クッキーポリシー。
受け入れる