wiley.comは安全ですか？

I actually found this platform when I just wanted to find some researches for my study at the university. But now I am planning to publish my recently done research devoted to a relevant topic nowadays. I know that guys from here can help me with this goal. I wanna note that navigation leaves much to be desired, I don't liek the website's layout at all. However, the concept itself is fascinating and it helps beginning researchers to claim about themselves and dive deep into science.

One of the rarest publishing companies that could preserve their reputation. I mean take a look at the majority, following the modern trader, promoting the topics of inequalities that sometimes reach the absurd. Here, if the piece deserves the attention, regardless what’s discussed there, doesn't matter. For such companies,it’s the main thing to remain consistent with their values and heritage.

I got no questions to them from the point of being a really advanced learning platform. Those technologies involved into learning process such as WileyPlus platform and others are cutting-edge ones. However, it seems to me that ebooks library needs to be expanded, I heard they have over 35k of ebooks, but whenever I try to search something for my subject, there are no books. Some of my searches was about quite famous books but this platform doesn't have them. It's a pity for me, so my advice is to expand the library.

Popular literature publisher. However, Wiley is a low-grade, low-quality source of multiple medical journals. Though many of their journals claim to be "peer-reviewed," they openly allow studies to be published for products that have been sponsored by the manufacturers of those products. According to Yale, "Studies sponsored by industry were 3.6 times more likely to have conclusions favorable to industry than studies without that support."[1] Wiley contributes to the scientific industry's dangerous "Replication Crisis," a human-harmful result of studies performed in unprofessional manners [2], such as by hosting papers written by corrupt authors sponsored to give good results by manufacturers. The Replication Crisis has resulted in nearly 40% of scientific studies being non-reproducible a second time. You can see one example of Wiley publishing a corrupt study sponsored by the manufacturer here: [3] Based on the evidence, Wiley is not a quality source of scientific publishing data, and its published studies should be scrutinized for the elements of unprofessionalism, such as corrupt funding, present in its content, that make it clear that actual scientific results are not strived for. 2 out of 5. [1]Google "Does industry funding equal conflict of interest? Often it does, Yale authors claim" (WOT mistakenly refuses to allow direct links to necessary sources) [2]Google "percent studies cannot be reproduced" (WOT mistakenly refuses to allow direct links to necessary sources) [3] Google "Efficacy and safety of a novel, soluble microneedle patch for the improvement of facial wrinkle, Ji Yeon Hong MD" (WOT mistakenly refuses to allow direct links to necessary sources)

You pay for an online lab course and they show their gratitude by making you do assignments with spelling errors, syntax errors, missing portions of the lab so that you cant even complete it. The labs are often broken and their customer support will laugh at you if they think they are right only to be proven wrong and then not respond. If it don't work, don't sell it!

Probably the best aspect of this site is the friendly community of ASP.NET developers. The forum section contains the largest interactive resource devoted specifically to ASP.NET development issues. In addition, the site highlights an ASP.NET article from the Web. Great site, and this has definitly allowed ASP.NET to grow to where it is today.