ageofautism.com é seguro?

This site is engaged in promoting false and misleading science and health claims and should not be trusted. Consult a physician for health concerns instead of quack and conspiracy sites. See: ***** and: ***** Untrustworthy.

This is site is pretty safe on a privacy and security level. It uses Google Analytics and has a SSL secure certificate, which is oddly not working on the home page, but it is also far less intrusive than many larger, corporate sites. I don't have an opinion regarding the subject matter. I want to hear all sides. It certainly deserves a robust debate and I think that many of these one-star ratings are intended to shut that down. Yes, the consequences are very dire, but that is why an open discussion and inquiry is so important. The 1.2 star rating that this site currently has serves to limit inquiry by scaring people off and I think that's an abuse of the WoT service.

It is ridiculous that this site is rated unsafe and does a disservice to people who want to try to get the various sorts of information. Do a search and see for yourself what the major causes of death are in the USA (think medical errors). And then think about how much you really want to trust the medical establishment (or even more the pharma establishment)

Age of Autism is an independently written blog that contains controversial beliefs of Autism and what causes it. Although it's not technically a "bad" site, it is spreading information that goes against what the scientific community and doctors alike have come to the conclusion of.

Many blanket statements are made on this site which link site-identfied "causes" with claimed "effects", without substantiating any link between the two.  Many accusations and claims are made which contradict the evidence-based state of understanding of medical topics.  This risks misinforming readers about the actual likelyhood of risks and benefits relating to modern medicine and infectious disease prevention.

Pro-Thimerosal hacks are swamping out web sites presenting factual scientific information about the dangers of using mercury (ethylmercury = Thimerosal) in vaccines, with negative ratings in WOT and other rating apps. There is a long history of peer reviwed scientific animal studies that demonstrate the neurotoxicity of Thimerosal. If the CDC was not so plagued with conflicts of interests, they would ban it (yes, the IG has found significant conflicts of interest on the panel that makes vaccine recommendations - follow the money).

With a glance, this is a blog site with opinions based on a specific view. Persons with different beliefs are criticizing it on WOT. This site is not harmful and, from a scientific view, well, scientists have different views on the topic of vaccines, autism etc.. Much of it is controversial and this site has a view that should be welcome information. Many doctors and scientist will also agree with it. Mainstream science and medicine is always stubborn with metals and other poisons that may or may not be harming a person.

Pushes the discredited theory that blames autism on vaccines. The "science" behind this theory consists of work by a researcher who fabricated his data. This theory has persuaded too many people to refrain from having their kids vaccinated, resulting in outbreaks of measles and other genuinely dangerous and avoidable diseases.