biblebelievers.org.au é seguro?
Site suspeito
Pontuação de segurança do site
43%
Este site é reivindicado?
Não
Avaliações da comunidade
★ 2.3
Algoritmo do WOT
46%
Segurança da Criança
40%
O que a comunidade diz?
Deixe um comentário
Compartilhe seus comentários e ajude a comunidadeAs resenhas devem consistir em pelo menos 15 caracteresEscolha as tags que melhor descrevem este site
Malware ou Vírus
Serviço ao cliente insuficiente
Phishing
Scam
Potencialmente ilegal
Enganoso ou antiético
Risco de Privacidade
Suspeito
Ódio, discriminação
Spam
Potencial programa indesejado
Anúncios / Pop-ups
Conteúdo Adulto
Nudez acidental
Macabro ou chocante
Cancelar
Publicar avaliação
2.3
Com base em 45 avaliações
Ordenar por:
Recentes
It's factual so I'm sure a lot of Wikipedia contributors have given this site a lower rating. I found it in depth and factual.
Útil
I don't know why some people have rated this site so poorly. It expounds truth from he word of God in a world that is filled with lies and deception..
Útil
Racist Holocaust denial.
Racist Holocaust denial.
3
Not a bit of hate in what I read ... unless you consider anything to do with the Bible as hate! They are just discussing a gentleman who spent 50 years of his life proving that the content of the Bible is a mathematical masterpiece ...
Útil
Wow. Now a biblical site is being blocked?
This whole WOT idea has been hijacked by morons.
Útil
Alternative vision of history of the second world war
Útil
There is nothing unsafe/malicious about this website. Tiresome how people put bad ratings on websites that contain content they don't agree with. It compromises the usefulness of WOT.
Útil
Once again, liberal commentators who have given this site a negative rating, are showing their true facist colors in trying to ban free speech. If you don't like the message, then don't visit the site.
2
This is not 'hate' or 'discriminatory' as a previous rater suggested.
It is a truthful, very graphic and horrific, but truthful testimony of the life experiences of a real person. It is hard to read, yet it is information that should be read. It is information that should shared and exposed.
Útil
Great info. Nobody disproved his research or collected the 10K$$ offered to disprove his research.
AS FOR THIS SITE.. DISCERN... not all is accurate. Dr. Panin info is good
Útil
People totally work the "WOT" system by slamming stuff that there's nothing wrong with, only they don't happen to agree with it. It's total censorship. This is another case. The site is fine. The opinions contained here are certainly valid, and the author makes a good case (along with other researches) as to the validity of the writing.
Útil
those who downgraded it under the false accusation of hate or discrimination were mistaken. The hate and discrimination is on THEIR part. The site is fine!
Útil
If you don't agree with a site's opinions then don't promote it. But to label this site as unsafe because it offends you is not the purpose of WOT. Stop doing this unless you are against free speech which is the spirit of the Internet. It is misleading to rate this unsafe.
Útil
I did not get any form of Trojan virus from this website. I have concluded that there are people giving this website a bad reputation because of their own mindset. I personally think that people should only rate a website as being bad if it is porn related or clearly prejudiced or uses profane language profusely or gives people some form of virus. Other than that the people who give this website a bad rating are just spammers.
Útil
Islamophobia Equals Pro-God
Thanks for clearing that up for me
...any "religion" that "preaches" hatred to babies, condones rape of children and killing of anyone and everyone that refuses to join your merry band is E.V.I.L.
Counterfeit religions are a cottage industry.
...That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it ...
The TRUTH Will Set You Free! ...Peace Be With You
Útil
The people giving this site a negative rating are just sheeple brainwashed by the mainstream media into thinking the views on this site are anti-semitic or racist. The truth is hard to swallow, just stop to think and see who really controls the media what historians really want you to believe.
2
Christian extremist, generally hateful content.
2
Political opinions, history and observations. No hate material, so what are those couple of posters going on about?
It appears that those posters are the 'misleading claimers', which would make them unethical, so why are they the first posting/rating seen here ???
Útil
site gets downrated by government employees since it contains valuable information everyone must know.
the simple rule that you should read everything that the government dont want you to read apply here.
Útil
Racist, Neo-nazi, white supremacist.
2
123
Verifique se você foi comprometidoConecte-se com o Google para escanear seu histórico de navegação.Ao fazer login, você concorda com a coleta e o uso de dados conforme descrito em nosso Termos de uso e Política de Privacidade
Conecte-se com o Google
Como visto em
Sobre o WOT
Analisamos mais de 2 milhões de sites e contamos. O WOT é uma extensão leve projetada para ajudá-lo a navegar com rapidez e segurança. Ele limpará seu navegador, o acelerará e protegerá suas informações privadas.Este é o seu site?
Reivindique seu site para acessar as ferramentas de negócios da WOT e se conectar com seus clientes.Reivindique Este Site
INSTALAR WOTEste site usa cookies para análises e personalização. Ao continuar, você concorda com a nossa política de cookies.
Aceitar