dailymail.co.uk é seguro?

Censors comments on old articles. Why? No idea, actually. It's not a forum, where bumping old threads means you're pushing newer threads down. It's an article! You'd think they'd want more traffic, but obviously not. It's a rather unintelligent business decision if you ask me and I have little respect for sites that do this. Same with not having anonymous log in. You want our traffic. That's the name of the game, fool!

Contains quite a bit of questionable content and themes, some of which can verge on racist or otherwise hateful. Some stories are more obvious than others, and some being very subtle in their ideals. Some however arn't so questionable, for example some will simply be about a sports result. Do be wary of what you read on this site, if you do intend to read it.

The ethical issues I'm referring to are journalistic ones. I gave up on believing anything I read in the Daily Fail [sic] a long, long, time ago. They do a decent job of hiding their bias - unlike other newspapers, such as The Sun - but that just makes them more dangerous. I would advise that one never trust anything one reads in the Mail or on its website, or that it is at least taken with a hefty pinch of salt. Especially the articles about cancer, immigration, and crime, which are all hyperbole at its finest. The paper seems to exist primarily for scaremongering and pushing of Conservative bias.