foxnews.com é seguro?

Confiado pela WOT

Pontuação de segurança do site

81%
A pontuação de segurança do WOT é baseada em nossas avaliações exclusivas de especialistas em tecnologia e comunidade.
Este site é reivindicado?
Não
Avaliações da comunidade
★ 4.3
Algoritmo do WOT
85%
Segurança da Criança
86%

O que a comunidade diz?

Deixe um comentário

De 1 a 5, que nota você daria a este site?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Compartilhe seus comentários e ajude a comunidadeAs resenhas devem consistir em pelo menos 15 caracteresEscolha as tags que melhor descrevem este site
Malware ou Vírus
Serviço ao cliente insuficiente
Phishing
Scam
Potencialmente ilegal
Enganoso ou antiético
Risco de Privacidade
Suspeito
Ódio, discriminação
Spam
Potencial programa indesejado
Anúncios / Pop-ups
Conteúdo Adulto
Nudez acidental
Macabro ou chocante
Cancelar
Publicar avaliação
4.3
starstarstarstarempty-star

Com base em 483 avaliações

Ordenar por:
Recentes
Faux News, It's all fake Trump Bullshit.
Útil
hurtful and divisive racial comments
Útil
хороший сайт
Útil
Отличный. Самый интересный сайт
Útil
This is the best source of unbias news anywhere.
Útil
J’ai l’habitude de consulter les nouvelles sur cette plateforme. Cela dit, il y a pas mal de messages publicitaires sur le site. Je me demande si les news sont toujours véridiques…
Útil
news site. regular posting and updates, some of the news might be shocking (but that's the world's fault - not the sites')
Útil
The most truthful news outlet in existence.
Útil
Site is safe to surf. However, be warned, Fox is more right wing opinion that actual news and is constantly posting fake news.
Útil
Spreads untrue news.
Útil
I trust this site to be truthful and a go to site for the real story. Other news sites are plastic.
Útil
Fox news is ideologically driven -- they typically view things from a conservative perspective. Also economic matters will always be viewed from a right-wing perspective. They will make arguments for deregulation, reduce tax burdens for the rich, pro-Wall street, Pro-corporation, Pro-money in politics, pro-fossil fuel industry. They are in favor of religious perspectives, they are against any measure to reduce gun violence through better regulation. Like all news they are a for profit company, and you make the most profit by saying things that appeal to your base and of course looking out for their financial benefactors -- they have large financial interests in other right wing industries (like Oil) so the truth is a distant and 3rd consideration, that only for the purpose of maintaining a minimum level of credibility that is necessary to make money.
1
Fox News is a safe website when it comes to the fact that there are no viruses or threats of malware. Although I would strongly advise getting your news from more credible sources like BBC or CBS News, because Fox News is extremely biased and caters to the Republican side of issues. If you want an unbiased and fair news source, Fox News is not it.
2
Worst mainstream news site on the internet. It's like the National Enquirer, though they really believe all this crap. And they now embrace Breitbart and other extreme right-wing websites. Biased, misleading, and sexist. Fox News is propaganda for the brainwashed. Keep away.
Útil
fox news is brainwashing tool not a website
Útil
Fox news is another basic news site, I agree it has biased information but to be honest, every writer puts their opinion into everything they write, this site is a perfect example of that. Site is child friendly meaning it has no malicious content that would be deemed directly harmful. Like all other business sites it deserves at least a fair rating.
1
This is not the Fox News I grew up with. Fox News in no way is deserving of the status of being a News company. They are worse than tabloid 'news' as of about a decade ago. They should be reclassified as garbage media, and renamed to Fox Views. It is a far more accurate description. Fox takes the most basic of news stories and finds an intellectually irresponsible and unethical way of twisting it into something that is flat out untrue, or, at the best, 30% true. Their idea of "experts" on a subject is the biggest joke I've ever seen, having been an expert in some of the fields they have reported on (computer security, computer science, and technology). They host the most uneducated "expert" guest speakers they can find, and these speakers distort the basic knowledge that is indisputable within the given field, making them unreliable sources of information. When Fox hosts a speaker of an opposing view on their programs, they practice very tactless ways of squelching the guest, including talking [yelling] over them, cutting the conversation short, and other practices widely regarded as journalistically unethical. Their poster-child, Bill O'Reilly, has multiple lawsuits for sexual harassment, including by his former co-host, Gretchen Carlson. O'Reilly is also a wife-beater. His daughter was recorded in court documents to have seen him choking his wife. This is not surprising, given his psychological profile. He is extroverted, highly aggressive, and has anger management issues. He has only been avoiding jail time by paying off people that he sexually harasses: "The employee, Juliet Huddy, had said that Mr. O’Reilly pursued a sexual relationship with her in 2011, at a time he exerted significant influence over her career. When she rebuffed his advances, he tried to derail her career, according to a draft of a letter from her lawyers to Fox News that was obtained by The New York Times...In exchange for her silence and agreement not to sue, she was paid a sum in the high six figures, according to people briefed on the agreement. The agreement was between Ms. Huddy, 47, and 21st Century Fox, the parent company of Fox News. The company and Mr. O’Reilly’s lawyer said her allegations were false." Of course he said it's false. He's a compulsive liar. You have to ask yourself the question: if it was false, why did he settle out of court and pay a six-figure sum to shut her up? If he was not guilty, going to court would have been his course of action. Bill O'Reilly is the most biased and crooked media personality of the age of television. The conservatives who watch him barely understand that he receives tons of money from special interests to oversimplify complicated topics and misconstrue facts into convenient lies. Fox Network's views sit squarely within the fascist neo-nazi area of government and philosophy, after the recent election. The recent electoral events have enabled and encouraged Fox to shift their message from a conservative philosophy to outright fascism. Demographic: Fox News's intended demographic is the uneducated masses that reside primarily outside of technologically advanced cities. They cater to the emotionally-responsive, irrational, uneducated masses. If you consider yourself a person of intellect, truth, reason, and knowledge, or a visionary, you are not going to find what you're looking for at Fox Views.
Útil
My biggest issue with FoxNews is how easily visible their entertainment branch of the site is. That section of the site is definitely not suitable for children. They frequently run slideshows showing the latest bikini pictures of celebrities, or the hottest underwear model pictures. Content like that is definitely not appropriate for children. The worst part is that those slideshows are frequently featured on the home page so they will most certainly reach little one's eyes. For being a "conservative" media outlet. They sure are liberal with what they expose children to. I use cnn instead because even though it tends to have a little more liberal bias they are usually more child friendly. (Not that it doesn't have it's own problems)
3
Fox News consistently has the highest Arbitron ratings than all the other news stations. Somewhat to the left of the other stations except One America News Network OANN. Fox & Friends does give both sides left and right/, Fair and balanced as they say
Útil
Conservative propaganda machine that tries to hide itself as a news site. Racism, misogyny, homophobia, xenophobia.
Útil
23456
...
25
Verifique se você foi comprometidoConecte-se com o Google para escanear seu histórico de navegação.
Conecte-se com o Google
Como visto em
Ao fazer login, você concorda com a coleta e o uso de dados conforme descrito em nosso Termos de uso e Política de Privacidade
alternative-placeholder

Sobre o WOT

Analisamos mais de 2 milhões de sites e contamos. O WOT é uma extensão leve projetada para ajudá-lo a navegar com rapidez e segurança. Ele limpará seu navegador, o acelerará e protegerá suas informações privadas.

Este é o seu site?

Reivindique seu site para acessar as ferramentas de negócios da WOT e se conectar com seus clientes.
Reivindique Este Site
Este site usa cookies para análises e personalização. Ao continuar, você concorda com a nossa política de cookies.
Aceitar