icr.org é seguro?

Confiado pela WOT

Pontuação de segurança do site

66%
A pontuação de segurança do WOT é baseada em nossas avaliações exclusivas de especialistas em tecnologia e comunidade.
Este site é reivindicado?
Não
Avaliações da comunidade
★ 3.5
Algoritmo do WOT
69%
Segurança da Criança
70%

O que a comunidade diz?

Deixe um comentário

De 1 a 5, que nota você daria a este site?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Compartilhe seus comentários e ajude a comunidadeAs resenhas devem consistir em pelo menos 15 caracteresEscolha as tags que melhor descrevem este site
Malware ou Vírus
Serviço ao cliente insuficiente
Phishing
Scam
Potencialmente ilegal
Enganoso ou antiético
Risco de Privacidade
Suspeito
Ódio, discriminação
Spam
Potencial programa indesejado
Anúncios / Pop-ups
Conteúdo Adulto
Nudez acidental
Macabro ou chocante
Cancelar
Publicar avaliação
3.5
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star

Com base em 36 avaliações

Ordenar por:
Recentes
Another religious cult site. Contains bible-literalism, speaks against some sexual orientations, and has anti-science theology. It is another right-winged religious site.
1
This website promotes pseudoscience, defiling real science to preserve both personal and religious agendas.
1
Pseudoscience, nonsense. Diplomas by this institute are not accepted by regular universities.
1
How does a site this fraught with fraud maintain a "good" rating? ICR promotes nonsense as science, and fights to undermine the education of our children.
2
An "Institute for research," of any kind, should not write articles full of emotionally charged language that seek to force the data to fit one pre-determined solution. Good research starts with information and then evaluates theories in the light of the data. However, this site evaluates data in the light of a theory. Due to the ethical issues of this website's reporting, I cannot vote it trustworthy or safe for children. At first glance, the site appears to be free of spyware though, so the other scores will remain high.
4
Slows down rational thoughts and condemns anything colliding with written literature created long ago to fill our gap of basic human curiosity of life's meaning. All this and claiming it to be a professional scientific site. In other words dangerous and self fulfilling nonsense is written all over it.
4
Lies and misinformation. A disgusting pile of political propaganda.
4
Psuedoscience & lies.
8
This parades as a scientific resource, when in fact is a religious website. I don't mind a religious website per se, but to parade as a resource of scientific rigor is ethically wrong.
10
The site could have been a good site for an alternate viewpoint if not for the fact that the articles are misleading and lacking research. The header uses such misleading words as "accurate" and "certain", but the articles do not provide any accurate or certain proof. The proof typically is based on the author's opinion. Example (from an author who prefaces his article with the disclaimer that he's "not particularly up on human anatomy"): "A person can function quite adequately without the gallbladder under normal conditions, but it's better to keep it. Mine was infected and damaged and is now gone, and I haven't missed it . . . but I wonder. ...Ever since sin entered the perfect creation and all systems began to deteriorate, sometimes things don't perform optimally." The author offers no proof to dispute the argument that the gallbladder is a vestigial organ, aside from the notion that "sin" has deteriorated our bodies, causing some things to not perform "optimally". He can give no reason as to why humans have tailbones, wisdom teeth, or other parts of the body considered unnecessary. If we follow his assumption that sin has caused things to "not perform optimally", how does he explain death from old age? Sin does not cause organs to deteriorate and age. The flesh is simply not immortal.
11
Sitio Creacionista. muy buena información para los que creen en la Biblia y la defienden desde su primer versiculo. Claro, a los RELIGIOSOS EVOLUCIONISTAS no les gusta, pues son INTOLERANTES a cualquiera que piense distinto a ellos y nos califican como "mentes débiles". "
2
Shows the science behind creation.
4
Great devotional for each day.
5
The organization has been a great source for scientific information concerning the origins of the universe for many years.
12
This organization has been accused of being an unaccredited diploma mill, which offers degrees that would not be accepted by other institutions.
13
Great science aspect apologetic site for Christian research.
10
12
Verifique se você foi comprometidoConecte-se com o Google para escanear seu histórico de navegação.
Conecte-se com o Google
Como visto em
Ao fazer login, você concorda com a coleta e o uso de dados conforme descrito em nosso Termos de uso e Política de Privacidade
alternative-placeholder

Sobre o WOT

Analisamos mais de 2 milhões de sites e contamos. O WOT é uma extensão leve projetada para ajudá-lo a navegar com rapidez e segurança. Ele limpará seu navegador, o acelerará e protegerá suas informações privadas.

Este é o seu site?

Reivindique seu site para acessar as ferramentas de negócios da WOT e se conectar com seus clientes.
Reivindique Este Site
Este site usa cookies para análises e personalização. Ao continuar, você concorda com a nossa política de cookies.
Aceitar