massreport.com é seguro?

I don't mind "anti-media" or "alternative news" but it still has to have integrity. Too many of the articles are pseudoscientific and rely on fear mongering. I've read better quack sites. Readers should be on the watch for conspiracy theories, half truths, and a glaring lack of citations. Know the difference between an opinion piece that is not well researched and journalism. I've only read about a dozen articles, maybe I chanced on the worst. Based on what I've seen, I'm putting it up there with Natural News, Food Babe, and Alex Jones.

They have a claim here that "science has discovered one definitive cause AND cure of cancer" And that Dr Otto Warbug received the Nobel Prize in 1931 for "proving that cancer can't survive in an oxygen rich environment". This is false. From nobelprize dot org: ""For his discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme, the Nobel Prize has been awarded to him in 1931. This discovery has opened up new ways in the fields of cellular metabolism and cellular respiration. He has shown, among other things, that cancerous cells can live and develop, even in the absence of oxygen." Proving that lions can survive in cold weather is obviously not the same as proving that warm weather kills lions. The worst kind of deception is that which starts with a grain of truth and distorts it. The obvious implication is that 'science' has known how to actually 'cure' cancer for more than 80 years, but everyone involved has instead chosen to allow victims to suffer and die - including, inevitably in some cases, their own colleagues, spouses, parents, children - why? So that they can make money on inferior treatments instead? Not a truthful site obviously. I don't wish to denigrate the value of a carefully chosen diet, but to make the utterly false claim that this is all you need to 'cure cancer' is unethical, and possibly illegal.