netlingo.com é seguro?

I have been receiving daily mails from this site and accessing it directly over a couple of years now without encountering a single incident of malware, child-inconvenient content, or any other unfavorable features. I add my voice to that of many others in asking how so many positives can be outweighed by 2 or 3 negatives (who may or may not be bonafide reports).

THIS SITE IS OK DO NOT LISTEN TO THE RETARDS! there's nothing wrong you idiots! I run avast up to date, and NOTHING shows, in fact decided to run a few other programs to see if I can find something hidden, and nope, you guys are idiots. well the ones who made 4 different accounts to report everything as bad, yes you know who you are, I've seen those usernames on NUMEROUS sites. find a real life, off the internet. why isn't anyone else saying anything other then posting a site? well except for the other obvious one who also says nothings wrong. HEY HFC YOU ILLITERATE MONKEY! I HAVE AVAST ALSO, AND YOU'RE A CROCK, AFTER THIS ONE I'M HONESTLY THINKING ABOUT GETTING RID OF WOT B/C OF THE SIMPLE FACT THAT THE INTERNET HAS TURNED INTO BOTS. NO ONE IS REAL ANYMORE,INCLUDING ALL THESE COMMENTS.

Here's another example of why WOT needs to update its algorithms. 3 a**hats outweigh 18 positives+ positive McAfee Site Advisor,+positive Linkcsanner+etc.. This site should be green UNLESS Panda detects malicious payloads, not because a nimrod <em>says</em> his AV detected malware.