nipccreport.org é seguro?

I'm ashamed of WOT. It's not supposed to be used to promote censorship of a website that has views that are controversial. This site is dedicated to giving a voice to the thousands of qualified scientists that don't drink the cool-aid call "man mad climate change". They don't get much funding and they can't get thier papers reviewed not because the science is incorrect but because it's not what governments want. Governments want their carbon taxes. There needs to be guidelines for WOT to discourage it from being used for censorship. There are lots of consensus ideas that need to be challenged today. And BTW. My views have nothing to do with the bible, Christianity or any other religion. I don't want to be associated with those people.

Masquerading as climate change "skeptics", led by fossil-fuel millionaires [1], and funded by conservative/libertarian organizations like the Heartland Institute [2] with ties to fossil fuel companies like ExxonMobil [3], the NIPCC (not to be confused with the actual scientific body IPCC), writes practically non-peer reviewed* pseudoscience** that goes counter to both scientific consensus [4] and evidence [5], and as such; should be taken with a grain of salt. *The only people who gets to review their papers are mostly other climate skeptics. [6] **E.g. NIPCC cites outdated and inaccurate research [7][8][9]etc. [1] ***** [2] ***** [3] ***** ***** [4] ***** ***** ***** [5] ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** et. al. [6] ***** [7] The NIPCC references Boretti: http://www.nipccreport.org/articles/2012/aug/8aug2012a1.html Yet Boretti later concludes his analysis was faulty: ***** [8] NIPCC cites outdated McLean research which is both flawed and disproven: ***** ***** [9] NIPCC often cites Houston, Dean, Benestad, and Schmidt who have also highly disputed and contradictory papers whose conclusions are also logically flawed: ***** *****

An excellent site, but if you're concerned about letting the facts get in the way of you political agenda on climate change, I advise you to stay well away. If on the other hand you wish to be well informed on both sides of the issue, you've come to the right place. This site profiles factual support, including a compendium of peer reviewed literature, for the premise that the recent global warming is not a predominately manmade phenomena. It is a sign of the times that just because they are not rabbit fans of the idea climate change is manmade, the intolerant mark it as an untrustworthy site. What better evidence is needed that dissent is no longer permitted? I wonder how may people who voted it as untrustworthy a have taken the time to actually read any of the information. I recommend you don't read anything on this site. You don't want to let the facts get in the way of your biases.

Good science-based website. Publishes peer-reviewed scientific research from around the world. An excellent counter-point to overly vocal fundamentalist anthropomorphic climate change websites for believers. I can understand why they would not like the site and not wish those who are undecided to view it. It gives an (occasionally strident) counter-balance to the debate- more than that available anywhere else. Keep it up!

This is a safe site...the Political trolls that down-rate the site are tools and fools pushing a political agenda. There are no malicious or harmful programming or mall-ware on this site. Just information the Bots do not like. The IPCC"S predictions have completely failed, and they are proven unable to predict anything. Read it for yourself; From a real NASA Scientist; 73 Climate Models vs. Observations for Tropical Tropospheric Temperature; *****

Untrustworthy, Makes claims to scientific objectivity when in reality it is politically motivated to spread misinformation, confusion and doubt about climate science. The real Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is at ***** Funding mostly from Heartland Institute known from internal documents to take an uninformed, contrarian and ideological anti-science position. See ***** ***** ***** ***** *****

excellent resource for the independent research on non-existant Global Warming, nowadays called Climate Change or Climate Disorder - notations which are only smoke and mirrors, used by the strange cult of the Guilt - and - Fear Religion of Maurice Strong which is part of the population reduction Agenda21. (Science For Sale just...) WOW, it must have taken endless time to compile this evidence and put it together on one place. Thank you to the scientists of NIPCC in the name of truth

This is the site of the Non Governmental International Panel on Climate Change. It contains only reliable scientific articles on the impacts (or lack thereof) of climate change. I was very surprised that the site would be flagged as not recommended and I consider this action as disinformation,

Another site that has been wrongly rated due to political views and not on the content of the site... The site is scientificlly based with good varifiable data and is totally child safe .... It is those that wish to stop debate and shut down anyone that disagrees with the new religion of AGW that go to these sites with hope to stop those seeking truth from even looking...