quackwatch.org é seguro?

Considerado seguro pelo WOT

4.5
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(30 Avaliações)
Bom site
Reivindicar este site
Compartilhar:
Compartilhe seus pensamentos...
K
starempty-star
Medíocre
starempty-star
Razoável
starempty-star
Mediano
starempty-star
Bom
starempty-star
Excelente
30 Avaliações da comunidade
Ordenar por:
Recentes
A proteção online mais confiável
r
há 9 meses
this site is run by Big Pharma TROLL
Útil
·
Denunciar
v
há 3 anos
QuackWatch provides consumer information about quackery, health fraud, and related topics. It is part of the QuackWatch network of sites operated by consumer advocate Stephen Barrett, M.D.
Útil
·
Denunciar
v
há 6 anos
It appears this website is sponsered by pharma companies who obviously do not want their sales to go down. So they will write against everything that threatens their market. He's a retired psychiatrist who pretends to know it all.
1
·
Denunciar
há 6 anos
The best site for information on dubious and unproven alternate medicine - and also warn people to stay away from them. No reason to not visit it.
Útil
·
Denunciar
há 6 anos
Author has a well researched, unbiased review of homeopathic medicines among many other quacks. Cites a wide variety of sources and knows what they are talking about. Reliable source of information for those looking for information about the latest Quacks.
1
·
Denunciar
R
há 7 anos
An excellent resource, for over 20 years, describing all the cons and quack treatments that have been foisted upon the sick, the suffering, and the uninformed.. There are many other reputable contributors to this site, besides dr Stephen Barrett, and all articles offer links to and citations from peer reviewed science based articles
1
·
Denunciar
r
há 7 anos
A much needed site, acting as bulwark against the onslaught of pseudo-science and pseudo-medicine.
Útil
·
Denunciar
há 8 anos
Whether this is a "front" website for pharmaceutical propaganda remains to be debated, but what needs no debate is the terrible disinformation this site promotes as fact misleading people for the Profit and Control of large Corporations who do not respect human rights. you should go to their website (and don't just read what I write) and search up various articles such as Colloidal Silver, Genetically Modified Organisms, Saturated Fat, Fluoride, people or groups such as Mercola and Weston A Price. you will see when you search up these items lies. For example: Colloidal Silver is blathered as "Dangerous" or "Watch out" and most popular "Argyria" bluing of skin. This is absolutely bias and the site doesn't even give all of the information ( which is a pattern I noticed ) namely how Colloidal Silver with its anti-bacterial properties which was used constantly for centuries ( along with copper ) with coins being thrown in milk or water containers of pioneer America and cups, bowls and eating utensils from medieval times made of the stuff. ( where the word "silverware" comes from ) Let's touch on Argyria, Quackwatch screams out beware but ( remember they don't tell you everything) that famous blue skin man ( who else have you saw that was blue considering millions of Americans use/buy silver ) and others most likely used poorly homemade silver, which resulted in large particle silver compounds and the person being much more susceptible to Argyria. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argyria#cite_note-26 ) Finally there is financial incentive given the rise of ( now notorious ) "Antibiotics" which are patentable ( and Profitable ) while silver is not. Lastly bacteria can't build up resistance on silver but on "Antibiotics" they can and have created a disastrous scenario of DANGEROUS "Antibiotic" Resistant Bacteria.( like MRSA ) You can see by this one example how ignorance ( from lack of responsible research ) can destroy humanity more than any weapon ever created I do not support this website because of that. ( Truly the PEN [or keyboard] is mightier than the Sword! ) related to silver: http://www.naturalnews.com/042507_copper_norovirus_silver.html Ps. Do you know they are also pro-GMO too!
Útil
·
Denunciar
u
há 8 anos
If you are tempted to go for "energy healing", "Alternative Medicine", Accupuncture, "Complementary Medicine", Naturopathy, Chirpquacty, etc. Check here first for the truth about medical scams
3
·
Denunciar
l
há 9 anos
Excellent Resource
4
·
Denunciar
>
há 9 anos
This site attempts to discredit without substantial basis or evidence alternative health advice. It seems to me to be an industry tool to deflect perfectly sensible and healthy criticism of questionable standard mainstream health drugs and treatments.
5
·
Denunciar
V
há 9 anos
The true Quacks are the ones running this site. These guys are bought and paid for by Big Pharma. This site is disgusting propaganda on key issues.
4
·
Denunciar
l
há 9 anos
accurate information regarding Dr. Burzynski, and other frauds out there
7
·
Denunciar
a
há 9 anos
Biased and most likely supported by Big Pharma who has no interest in healthy people
5
·
Denunciar
há 9 anos
Very interesting scientific information. Especially interesting was this article: http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Victims/craven.html
7
·
Denunciar
há 9 anos
Great site to protect consumers.
10
·
Denunciar
há 9 anos
Great science related website. Safe.
11
·
Denunciar
c
há 9 anos
Just because something is not yet proven by science, does not make it untrue. Especially in the field of medical science.
9
·
Denunciar
há 9 anos
Biased presentation of the facts regarding Dr. Burzynski
9
·
Denunciar
c
There is certainly some good information here, but many of the pieces on this site are either out-of-date (by as much as 15 years in some cases) or unnecessarily dogmatic and prejudiced. Among many other things, the author attempts to discredit organic farming and acupuncture. Personally, I demand solid scientific evidence for medical claims, and support having a healthy dose of skepticism, but these folks are taking it too far IMHO. Make your own decisions about alternative medicine practices based on common sense, consult allopathic AND naturopathic doctors, and keep in mind that the author of Quackwatch is highly biased. For further information about Quackwatch's author and his trustworthiness, I suggest examining this article: https://www.youngliving.org/US/quackwatch/quackwatch2_content.asp
9
·
Denunciar
«
12
»

Sobre este site

Confiabilidade
89
/100
Segurança da Criança
90
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept