rationalwiki.org é seguro?

Confiado pela WOT

Pontuação de segurança do site

83%
A pontuação de segurança do WOT é baseada em nossas avaliações exclusivas de especialistas em tecnologia e comunidade.
Este site é reivindicado?
Não
Avaliações da comunidade
★ 4.4
Algoritmo do WOT
88%
Segurança da Criança
84%

O que a comunidade diz?

Deixe um comentário

De 1 a 5, que nota você daria a este site?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Compartilhe seus comentários e ajude a comunidadeAs resenhas devem consistir em pelo menos 15 caracteresEscolha as tags que melhor descrevem este site
Malware ou Vírus
Serviço ao cliente insuficiente
Phishing
Scam
Potencialmente ilegal
Enganoso ou antiético
Risco de Privacidade
Suspeito
Ódio, discriminação
Spam
Potencial programa indesejado
Anúncios / Pop-ups
Conteúdo Adulto
Nudez acidental
Macabro ou chocante
Cancelar
Publicar avaliação
4.4
starstarstarstarhalf-star

Com base em 74 avaliações

Ordenar por:
Recentes
Hateful leftist equivalent of a third reich nazi page
Útil
Just a bag full of lies & propaganda
Útil
Community site full of terrible hate and adult content
Útil
Not bad, but it does seems to have a leftist slant sometimes to its detriment
Útil
Not a reliable site for TRUTH. openly chides true Christianity, not understanding Scripture because it has not been revealed to them by GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT.
Útil
rationalwiki.org berichtet einseitig atheistisch. Argumente der Gegenseite werden komplett unterschlagen!
Útil
They seem to have nothing good to say about anyone. It's just a raunchy humor site, I guess. At least, I'm certain they find the site funny. It's all insult humor. To each his own.
1
Dismantles the cranks. Warning, may contain sarcasm.
Útil
Great anti-pseudoscience, anti-quackery, anti-authoritarianism resource! Rational Wiki is slightly biased pro-left no doubt. There are, however, some articles that do criticize the left or other people besides just white conservatives: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antifascist_Action#Internal_divisions https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch#Motte_and_bailey https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Black_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Female_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Hard_green https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moralistic_fallacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shoehorning#Politics https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_media_platforms#Tumblr https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center#Criticism RW does have fair share of opinion crept in, though, ought to be noted. Thankfully, like Wikipedia, there sometimes is the "Citation needed" -note in place where a citation hasn't been added. Oftentimes citations can be found. Sections on logical arguments are gold! Recommended alongside many other sources.
1
With the pervasiveness of misinformation, half truths and outright lies to be found in social media it is absolutely necessary that sites like this exist to inform and educate and to foster critical thinking.
1
Not exactly the most accurate, but very entertaining.
2
Site satirique combattant diverses pseudosciences. Ne cache pas ses prise de position.
3
This is a good and useful site since it promotes rational thought and helps debunks some of the more pernicious lies, disinformation campaigns and other poison that can be found on the internet. I would consider this child-friendly as well since one would want their children to be wise and think for themselves.
2
This website is run by feminists, which means that everything in this article is biased against male. Use this site for humor only.
2
Some language (e.g., bulls--t). View it before your kids do.
1
Worst of the worst regressive left propaganda. Site even promotes pedophilia. Sick fucks. Not safe for children at all.
2
Whether it is a joke or somebody actually believes crazy stuff they write on this site, it should be marked as such instead of masquerading as a wikipedia-type page.
2
I'll start with an edited tweet by Anita Sarkeesian. ***** Metapedia has poor ratings because it's (at least it seems to be) a Neo-nazi wiki. Rationalwiki may not take itself seriously, but it deserves to be treated equally to its slightly less rational counterparts.
Útil
Very informative, covers the main areas of pseudoscience (religious or otherwise), conspiracy theories and alien-spotting. Calls a spade a spade.
2
No viruses or any other sort. However, it is terribly biased towards third wave feminism/atheism : "Christina Hoff Sommers (born 1950) is a self-declared feminist" http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Christina_Hoff_Sommers -Note the word "self-declared" Questionable use of language and is also a for-atheism site. I am not religious, but Wikipedia is a better source of unbiased information than this site. TL;DR Website is safe, information is slightly biased
1
1234
Verifique se você foi comprometidoConecte-se com o Google para escanear seu histórico de navegação.
Conecte-se com o Google
Como visto em
Ao fazer login, você concorda com a coleta e o uso de dados conforme descrito em nosso Termos de uso e Política de Privacidade

Sobre o WOT

Analisamos mais de 2 milhões de sites e contamos. O WOT é uma extensão leve projetada para ajudá-lo a navegar com rapidez e segurança. Ele limpará seu navegador, o acelerará e protegerá suas informações privadas.

Este é o seu site?

Reivindique seu site para acessar as ferramentas de negócios da WOT e se conectar com seus clientes.
Este site usa cookies para análises e personalização. Ao continuar, você concorda com a nossa política de cookies.
Aceitar