rationalwiki.org é seguro?

Considerado seguro pelo WOT

4.4
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(74 Avaliações)
Bom site
Popular
Reivindicar este site
Compartilhar:
Compartilhe seus pensamentos...
K
starempty-star
Medíocre
starempty-star
Razoável
starempty-star
Mediano
starempty-star
Bom
starempty-star
Excelente
74 Avaliações da comunidade
Ordenar por:
Recentes
A proteção online mais confiável
v
há 3 meses
Just a bag full of lies & propaganda
Útil
·
Denunciar
há 10 meses
Community site full of terrible hate and adult content
Útil
·
Denunciar
há 2 anos
Not bad, but it does seems to have a leftist slant sometimes to its detriment
Útil
·
Denunciar
há 2 anos
Not a reliable site for TRUTH. openly chides true Christianity, not understanding Scripture because it has not been revealed to them by GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT.
Útil
·
Denunciar
a
rationalwiki.org berichtet einseitig atheistisch. Argumente der Gegenseite werden komplett unterschlagen!
Útil
·
Denunciar
They seem to have nothing good to say about anyone. It's just a raunchy humor site, I guess. At least, I'm certain they find the site funny. It's all insult humor. To each his own.
Útil
·
Denunciar
j
Dismantles the cranks. Warning, may contain sarcasm.
Útil
·
Denunciar
d
Great anti-pseudoscience, anti-quackery, anti-authoritarianism resource! Rational Wiki is slightly biased pro-left no doubt. There are, however, some articles that do criticize the left or other people besides just white conservatives: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antifascist_Action#Internal_divisions https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch#Motte_and_bailey https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Black_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Female_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Hard_green https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moralistic_fallacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shoehorning#Politics https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_media_platforms#Tumblr https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center#Criticism RW does have fair share of opinion crept in, though, ought to be noted. Thankfully, like Wikipedia, there sometimes is the "Citation needed" -note in place where a citation hasn't been added. Oftentimes citations can be found. Sections on logical arguments are gold! Recommended alongside many other sources.
1
·
Denunciar
g
há 3 anos
With the pervasiveness of misinformation, half truths and outright lies to be found in social media it is absolutely necessary that sites like this exist to inform and educate and to foster critical thinking.
1
·
Denunciar
há 4 anos
Not exactly the most accurate, but very entertaining.
1
·
Denunciar
há 4 anos
Site satirique combattant diverses pseudosciences. Ne cache pas ses prise de position.
2
·
Denunciar
há 4 anos
This is a good and useful site since it promotes rational thought and helps debunks some of the more pernicious lies, disinformation campaigns and other poison that can be found on the internet. I would consider this child-friendly as well since one would want their children to be wise and think for themselves.
2
·
Denunciar
T
há 5 anos
This website is run by feminists, which means that everything in this article is biased against male. Use this site for humor only.
1
·
Denunciar
há 5 anos
Some language (e.g., bulls--t). View it before your kids do.
Útil
·
Denunciar
D
há 5 anos
Worst of the worst regressive left propaganda. Site even promotes pedophilia. Sick fucks. Not safe for children at all.
1
·
Denunciar
O
há 6 anos
Whether it is a joke or somebody actually believes crazy stuff they write on this site, it should be marked as such instead of masquerading as a wikipedia-type page.
1
·
Denunciar
w
há 6 anos
I'll start with an edited tweet by Anita Sarkeesian. http://i.imgur.com/pFsUupa.png Metapedia has poor ratings because it's (at least it seems to be) a Neo-nazi wiki. Rationalwiki may not take itself seriously, but it deserves to be treated equally to its slightly less rational counterparts.
Útil
·
Denunciar
há 6 anos
Very informative, covers the main areas of pseudoscience (religious or otherwise), conspiracy theories and alien-spotting. Calls a spade a spade.
2
·
Denunciar
M
há 6 anos
No viruses or any other sort. However, it is terribly biased towards third wave feminism/atheism : "Christina Hoff Sommers (born 1950) is a self-declared feminist" http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Christina_Hoff_Sommers -Note the word "self-declared" Questionable use of language and is also a for-atheism site. I am not religious, but Wikipedia is a better source of unbiased information than this site. TL;DR Website is safe, information is slightly biased
Útil
·
Denunciar
R
há 6 anos
They bias here is amazing. The info here is mostly factual but cherry-picked so any factuality is canceled out. They slander and bash anyone who does not share their Atheism+ SJWhiner viewpoints regardless of what those groups/people believe.
1
·
Denunciar
«
123
...
4
»

Sobre este site

Confiabilidade
88
/100
Segurança da Criança
84
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to our cookies policy
Accept