scientology.org é seguro?

I agree that one of WOT's weaknesses, is the fact that personal animosity often taints the rating of sites. However overall, I think that in this case, most of the criticisms are accurate: Spam: Whilst I'm not someone given to hyperbole, I genuinely think that Scientology would have a real shot at being listed as THE most aggressive spam marketer in the world. It's almost impossible to get taken off their mailing list if you're unfortunate enough to give them your address. People move house...,move several times...and Sci still continues to bombard them. How? They're so desperate to get their poxy spam out, that they use skip tracing techniques to keep people on their Roladex. Probably a majority of these people have repeatedly told them to stop too, so this speaks volumes. If you know any Scientologists who've been involved for any time, you'll know that most all of them screen EVERY call with an answering machine. The reason? To avoid the yet another badgering sales pitch by their 'beloved' 'church.' To counter this, the 'church' sends staff out in groups of 3 to knock doors, normally in the evening, because that's when most people are in. But where they really show their true world class spam qualities, are when they fail to get an answer...normally they'll sneak around into the back yard, peeking through the windows, and then as soon as they clock the mark, whichever of the three it was, will start knocking on the window! So spam? Yup, by post, by email, by phone, in person, and to a degree you will never believe unless you experience it. Annoying ads or popups: Not so much. The site's actually very nicely put together. Interestingly, for all the claims of "malicious ratings," at the time of writing this comment, there's only 1 person who's ticked the option. "C'mon you maliciousers [sic], get to it. We need fake ratings! Bad customer experience: the web, the media, government agencies, and the courts are all deluged with "bad customer experiences." Many, absolutely horrendous Fraud, scam, phishing: The site is undoubtedly trying to draw people into a fraud, at least if you take the words of numerous judges as valid, it is. Scientology itself. I'd say is about 30% genuinely helpful stuff, and 70% about very cleverly, very insidiously trapping and then enslaving people's minds in the cult. To me, that adds up to 100% scam. Phishing, that's really left to OSA (Scientology's intelligence service), and that's a whole other kettle of fish. Hateful, violent or illegal content: Well they're definitely hateful, primarily towards Psychiatrists of all people (don't ask...the reason is VERY bizarre...roughly, they believe that Psychiatrists are the source of all evil going back billions of years...more recently, they've been behind the the war in Bosnia, 9--11 and a whole host of other assorted crimes. Scientologists aren't a particularly violent bunch, at least not physically. The violence they tend to dish out is spiritual and mental in nature: far more damaging to my way of thinking. Illegal content: on the site itself there's certainly a good deal that's about to be taken through the courts. So we'll just have to see on that one. Useless: no the site is interesting to many people, so it's far from useless. Other: Really this should be the biggest category. But jeez, where do you even begin...

Can anybody please leave some decent comments about the website? Even if you are a person who dislikes Scientology, please give others the chance to at least find out information about the religion without having an already tainted idea of it. This is, from what I understand, a rating of the website and not of the religion itself.

This cult is extremely dangerous, and has covered the crimes they have committed that have killed, silenced, and discredited people against the policies of the "Church" of Scientology. The "Church" exploits its members out of money, brainwashes them into performing hard labor and actions outside of moral values, such as disconnecting with family members against Scientology. For more information, see xenu.net