staged.com é seguro?

***** is a real success story. My posts are often shared on social media sites and it is fun to create these staged pages. Giving out a warning, if a site contains some ads, and pretending that this site would be a scam because of these ads, is nothing but slander. Such kind of WOT ratings cannot be taken serious. Does WOT contribute to a safer internet? I don't think so. I recommend to install Kaspersky to protect your computer from viruses, phishing sites, malware, etc. This is not a job for human raters.

I am a security consultant in the information and data security field. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this site. It is a Ray Steven's video that is ideologically conservative. That is no reason to ruin it's reputation. Lying liberals are using W.O.T. to bash conservatives constantly. This is rendering W.O.T. useless. I am telling my clients to remove W.O.T. in favor of Ghostery and Spybot search and destroy (which will immunize your browser) in lieu of W.O.T.

They use a great video to get you to their page to solicit untrustworthy services and products. It is appropriately rated poorly based on ethics. If they were just sharing the video, it would take you directly to YouTube where it is hosted. It's like showing up for coffee at Starbucks to meet a new friend, only to find out it was an Amway meeting.

Why is this rated poorly? is it a political opinion that is unpopular? That is not an appropriate basis for a poor rating. Furthermore, the statements are true. So the WOT ratings are subject to the bias of unknown and unknowable persons? how can anyone trust WOT if its ratings are highly biased and unfair?