wikipedia.org é seguro?

A nice place to read info and etc but I heard that anybody can write anything about the topic that I am reading. So now I have no idea on where the info is taken, and only read those which have some references like preferrably to every sentence. And it's not easy to set up a system wheer every author is certified or passed a check of some kind.

That`s resources educated so many people that it`s difficult to count, I guess. IF I need to get some information about something, I just open wikipedia and read all the needed sections, in a few clicks. The most interesting thing is that authors writing these long articles do it for free, as a contribution to the community. To be honest, I lose some belief in humanity, but with such services make me feel that not everything is lost. Though, for sure, it can be called the most accurate sources of information, in terms of some academic and specific knowledge that professors are looking for in their research. But, for the general public and people, like I guess, you and I, it`s cool sources of self-development and learning. Yeah, the Internet expands the borders of possibilities.

I don't really use it that often, but boy when I enter one link, it is not only one link The real beauty of Wiki is that from one thing, you can go over another thing quickly and gather some extensive info on the knowledge. Once I click on some link, after 15 minutes I can end up reading something that is so remotely related to my original search, it is baffling indeed. What I failed to appreciate about WIki was in the past that I didnt acknowledge how optimized the website was. It has SO much info and different articles in it, and it moves in a matter of seconds the moment you click. Who ever is optimized it, did a wonderful job and I am grateful for this service.

NOTHING regarding politics or science is to be trusted on this site. A blatantly left-wing political bias is enforced a tiny handful of editors who routinely post false information and block edits that don't support their agenda. Bans on those who expose the site's bias are common.

Hm... Of course, the information which wikipedia contains is not proved. I mean, not all the time, it makes sense to pay attention only to those facts that are proven by references given on them. As for other information then it's dubious, as wikipedia is an open resource where any person can edit something. The concept is okayish, but sometimes it's used to mislead and disinform people about crucial events in the world. So, better watch out guys. Despite this detail - it's cool.