wikipedia.org é seguro?

Considerado seguro pelo WOT

4.7
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(603 Avaliações)
Bom site
Opiniões, religião, política
Outros
Medicina alternativa ou controversa
Reivindicar este site
Pergunte à nossa comunidade
Compartilhar:

wikipedia.org

4.7
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(603 Avaliações)
Proteja Seu Telefone
1. Obtenha alertas sobre websites inseguros.
2. Bloqueie conteúdo adulto.
3. Fique seguro em qualquer lugar.
Compartilhe seus pensamentos...
starempty-star
Medíocre
starempty-star
Razoável
starempty-star
Mediano
starempty-star
Bom
starempty-star
Excelente
603 Avaliações da comunidade
Ordenar por:
Recentes
Aug 8, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Тут будет коротко и ясно. Что не знаю - иду сюда! И этим все сказано.
Útil
Aug 3, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Каждый день вспоминается какая то дребедень , то как что устроено, то про птиц, то про зверей, то про всяких там людей. Все найдется в этом сайте. Энциклопедия просто огромнейшая . Найдется все и про все , даже про то что ни когда и не слышал можно там откопать что то интересное . Дизайн простой и понятный. Не глюков не тормозов. Захожу на этот сайт практически каждый день .
Útil
Jul 29, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Единственная и лучшая интернет-энциклопедия. Всегда проверяю какие-то факты только здесь.
Útil
Jun 26, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Great website for learning just about anything you need to know.
Útil
Jun 26, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Very popular online respository of knowledge. One thing to note, best to double check details from reputable sources if doing a research paper though.
Útil
Jun 26, 2020
starstarstarstarempty-star
Perhaps the best website in the world right now.
Útil
Jun 22, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Как же мне жалко википедию! ЛЮБЛЮ ЕЁ
Útil
Jun 8, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Perhaps the best website in the world right now.
Útil
starstarstarstarstar
Множно найти много нужной и полезной информации)
Útil
Jun 1, 2020
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
Wikipedia reverses the original idea of an encyclopedia: No longer are individual experts alone publishing their knowledge, but a production community of many. In doing so, it feels committed to the neutral presentation of world knowledge, and consciously not to the evaluation of the same. Thanks to the collaborative working method, there are now over 2 million articles in the German-language Wikipedia, which is more than Brockhaus covers. In total there are almost 300 language versions. The principle underlying Wikipedia is simple: Any user can edit, improve or even add articles in Wikipedia. However, only edits that have been approved by experienced authors are retained. The operators of Wikipedia (the Wikimedia Foundation) generally do not intervene in the "ongoing operation" and instead rely on the self-organisation of the Wikipedia community. Because everyone has the opportunity to participate in Wikipedia, there are complex rules and roles without which the community could not function and the quality of articles could not be guaranteed. It is important that these rules are followed so that everyone can contribute within their own capabilities. Active authors gain more skills the longer they are involved and the more edits they make to articles. So-called classifiers take on the largest share of all administrative tasks. Their typical tasks include the removal of vandalism, the viewing of content - with the right to check contributions from others in order to either release or discard them - , the administration of archives, the holding of deletion discussions, etc. The openness of Wikipedia also brings with it vandalism, which in Wikipedia is taken to mean deliberately inserted inappropriate content. Wikipedia authors with viewer status take on the thankless task of eliminating this vandalism. The original texts are usually restored within minutes. The special nature of the way Wikipedia is created makes it a never-ending project that is constantly being improved, expanded and updated. To ensure that the quality of Wikipedia does not suffer as a result of the participation of many, authors are subject to the rules mentioned above. With a few tips and a little experience, it is possible to learn to correctly evaluate the quality of Wikipedia articles, because even within Wikipedia there are differences in quality. It is therefore necessary to be able to judge for yourself how reliable the articles there are. Under "How to recognize a good Wikipedia article", for example, relevant clues are suggested. Basically, Wikipedia is a good starting point for research work, but should not be the only and last source to be accessed and quoted on a topic. When citing, it is generally recommended to refer to primary rather than secondary sources, the latter including Wikipedia.
Útil
May 31, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Русская из СНГ лучше всех как по мне !
Útil
May 11, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
The most useful website on the internet.
Útil
Apr 24, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Отличный сайт но по регионам очень отличается... одна и та же инфа на русской вике и на украинской - могут отличаться
Útil
Apr 5, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
very good website
Útil
Mar 23, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Отличный справочный сайт.
Útil
Mar 22, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Fantastic website which have answers to all of the questions out there, you really can buy and get all what you want with that thing absolutely. Every your issue already covered here in a very detailed way entirely and completely.
Útil
starstarstarstarstar
ООООчень хороший справочный материал , на все вопросы есть ответы ,хороший источник материала .
Útil
Feb 14, 2020
starhalf-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
anyone can edit it, and is notorious for having false information.
Útil
starstarstarstarstar
Самая большая база со справочными материалами, которую я встречал в сети Интернет. Пульзуюсь ей регулярно.
Útil
Jan 25, 2020
starstarstarstarstar
Each and everything on the website wikipedia.
Útil
«
123
...
31
»

Sobre este site

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

Confiabilidade
94
/100
Segurança da Criança
94
/100