wikipedia.org é seguro?

Confiado pela WOT

Pontuação de segurança do site

89%
A pontuação de segurança do WOT é baseada em nossas avaliações exclusivas de especialistas em tecnologia e comunidade.
Este site é reivindicado?
Não
Avaliações da comunidade
★ 4.7
Algoritmo do WOT
94%
Segurança da Criança
93%

O que a comunidade diz?

Deixe um comentário

De 1 a 5, que nota você daria a este site?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
Compartilhe seus comentários e ajude a comunidadeAs resenhas devem consistir em pelo menos 15 caracteresEscolha as tags que melhor descrevem este site
Malware ou Vírus
Serviço ao cliente insuficiente
Phishing
Scam
Potencialmente ilegal
Enganoso ou antiético
Risco de Privacidade
Suspeito
Ódio, discriminação
Spam
Potencial programa indesejado
Anúncios / Pop-ups
Conteúdo Adulto
Nudez acidental
Macabro ou chocante
Cancelar
Publicar avaliação
4.7
starstarstarstarhalf-star

Com base em 685 avaliações

Ordenar por:
Recentes
Perhaps the best website in the world right now.
1
Множно найти много нужной и полезной информации)
Útil
Wikipedia reverses the original idea of an encyclopedia: No longer are individual experts alone publishing their knowledge, but a production community of many. In doing so, it feels committed to the neutral presentation of world knowledge, and consciously not to the evaluation of the same. Thanks to the collaborative working method, there are now over 2 million articles in the German-language Wikipedia, which is more than Brockhaus covers. In total there are almost 300 language versions. The principle underlying Wikipedia is simple: Any user can edit, improve or even add articles in Wikipedia. However, only edits that have been approved by experienced authors are retained. The operators of Wikipedia (the Wikimedia Foundation) generally do not intervene in the "ongoing operation" and instead rely on the self-organisation of the Wikipedia community. Because everyone has the opportunity to participate in Wikipedia, there are complex rules and roles without which the community could not function and the quality of articles could not be guaranteed. It is important that these rules are followed so that everyone can contribute within their own capabilities. Active authors gain more skills the longer they are involved and the more edits they make to articles. So-called classifiers take on the largest share of all administrative tasks. Their typical tasks include the removal of vandalism, the viewing of content - with the right to check contributions from others in order to either release or discard them - , the administration of archives, the holding of deletion discussions, etc. The openness of Wikipedia also brings with it vandalism, which in Wikipedia is taken to mean deliberately inserted inappropriate content. Wikipedia authors with viewer status take on the thankless task of eliminating this vandalism. The original texts are usually restored within minutes. The special nature of the way Wikipedia is created makes it a never-ending project that is constantly being improved, expanded and updated. To ensure that the quality of Wikipedia does not suffer as a result of the participation of many, authors are subject to the rules mentioned above. With a few tips and a little experience, it is possible to learn to correctly evaluate the quality of Wikipedia articles, because even within Wikipedia there are differences in quality. It is therefore necessary to be able to judge for yourself how reliable the articles there are. Under "How to recognize a good Wikipedia article", for example, relevant clues are suggested. Basically, Wikipedia is a good starting point for research work, but should not be the only and last source to be accessed and quoted on a topic. When citing, it is generally recommended to refer to primary rather than secondary sources, the latter including Wikipedia.
Útil
Русская из СНГ лучше всех как по мне !
Útil
The most useful website on the internet.
1
Отличный сайт но по регионам очень отличается... одна и та же инфа на русской вике и на украинской - могут отличаться
Útil
very good website
1
Отличный справочный сайт.
Útil
Fantastic website which have answers to all of the questions out there, you really can buy and get all what you want with that thing absolutely. Every your issue already covered here in a very detailed way entirely and completely.
Útil
ООООчень хороший справочный материал , на все вопросы есть ответы ,хороший источник материала .
Útil
anyone can edit it, and is notorious for having false information.
Útil
Самая большая база со справочными материалами, которую я встречал в сети Интернет. Пульзуюсь ей регулярно.
Útil
Each and everything on the website wikipedia.
Útil
Best Best ! its really the best page to spend hours of reading - Love it
Útil
отличный сайт
Útil
Один из лучших сайтов...и без рекламы!
Útil
Полезный сайт для самообразования. Но информацию всё же нужно перепроверять
Útil
Топовый сайт есть информация о всём
Útil
Огромная база знаний, очень много информации, здесь можно найти все что угодно и обо всем.
Útil
***** Check Me pls :)
Útil
45678
...
35
Verifique se você foi comprometidoConecte-se com o Google para escanear seu histórico de navegação.
Conecte-se com o Google
Como visto em
Ao fazer login, você concorda com a coleta e o uso de dados conforme descrito em nosso Termos de uso e Política de Privacidade
alternative-placeholder

Sobre o WOT

Analisamos mais de 2 milhões de sites e contamos. O WOT é uma extensão leve projetada para ajudá-lo a navegar com rapidez e segurança. Ele limpará seu navegador, o acelerará e protegerá suas informações privadas.

Este é o seu site?

Reivindique seu site para acessar as ferramentas de negócios da WOT e se conectar com seus clientes.
Reivindique Este Site
Este site usa cookies para análises e personalização. Ao continuar, você concorda com a nossa política de cookies.
Aceitar