Безопасен ли ap.org?

It's like a media for everyone, they serve both publics and government and the latter thing raises questions. Objectivity is under threat, because when a media serves government then it can't be called independent, hence, the objecitivness of the content is doubted. I checked some breaking news topics and they are all about politics and "agenda" highly spreads nowadays. Don't like such state of affairs and do my best to stand by all this stuff not to have my brain taken under control.

Blatant Russophobia. Misleading articles about the war in Ukraine/Donbass.

"I’m sure that you, like me, were chilled to read about the recent case of a New York teenager who was caught shoplifting, only for police to discover a dead newborn at the bottom of her bag. According to medical examiners, the little boy was nearly full-term, born alive, and may have died by asphyxiation. Authorities remain tight-lipped about what exactly they believe happened here. But whether this was willful murder or a terrible accident, the press has already decided one thing: they can’t let the story garner sympathy for any of the unborn slaughtered by abortion every day. Mainstream media outlets such as the Associated Press and CBS News simply refuse to call the victim a “baby,” instead referring to him only as a “fetus.” Never mind the fact that the dictionary specifically defines “fetus” as “a human being [. . .] BEFORE it is born.” The “precise and accurate” language authorities like the AP Stylebook boast about apparently doesn’t count when the facts are inconvenient for the abortion lobby. It is sickening to hear stories like this, but tragically, killing this baby would have been perfectly legal if only it was done before he left the womb. If the mainstream media ignores the grim truth about abortion, then you and I must not. For Life, Martin Fox, President National Pro-Life Alliance"

Tech Crunch banned them: ***** They shut down bloggers for posting snippets and links. They even went after google!