Безопасен ли barenakedislam.com?

Excellent site, Tells the total truth that Liberals are not told (They should try reading the Quran) I sooner make Obamas site untrustworthy and any other government site for that matter.

This is why I dont like WOT. There are other web rating sites besides wot. There isnt a DAMN thing wrong with this site. It tells the truth, which offends the EVIL DOERS, whereby they continue their evil bad bad rating sites that speak the truth. Fuck off and die, you candy assed liberals and muslim SCUM.

There is nothing at all suspicious about this website - it's very informative and has articles and videos that you certainly won't see in the government-compliant mainstream media. The only reason I can see for it's bad WOT rating is that there a lot of Left-wing internet apparatchiks out there whose political masters don't want you to see the website's content.

I would imagine that some of the comments that make this site questionable are because some of the content is very graphic. But it is hard to tell the unvarnished truth, as this site does, about the murderous and uncivilized practices of islam, the obvious lies of CAIR and the dangers of Creeping Shariah law. This site provides true, verifiable information about the atrosities committed by islamics in the U.S, and other countries around the world that will NEVER be found in any reports of the Main Stream Media. SweetOlBob

VORSICHT! BEWARE! I am allowed to interpret anything anyway I want. I am allowed to interpret anything anyway I want. I am allowed to interpret anything anyway I want. BNI, auch genannt/also known as "Bare naked Islam." www.barenakedislam.com/2013/07/20/france-muslims-upset-over-expansion-of-the-french-headbag-ban-to-the-private-sector?replytocom=196588#respond Huck Folder July 20, 2013 @ 9:37 pm The sign below says, “If you are against the Muslim veil, you are against Islam.” Bonni: I believe it says “Law against the veil, or against islam.” which I would think is supposed to be a question, but without the question mark being present. BareNakedIslam July 21, 2013 @ 12:50 am HF, I like my interpretation better. Furor Teutonicus July 22, 2013 @ 5:26 am Huck is correct. “(Is) the law against the veil or against islam (?), (“Is” and end question mark missing in origional) Furor Teutonicus July 22, 2013 @ 5:29 am XX BareNakedIslam July 21, 2013 @ 12:50 am HF, I like my interpretation better. XX Leave the bending of truth, and missinterpretation of word to the ragheads. WE are the truth bringers. NOT the rabid propogandaists. BareNakedIslam July 22, 2013 @ 1:33 pm FT, this is none of your business. Get over yourself. I am allowed to interpret anything anyway I want. Furor Teutonicus July 23, 2013 @ 1:15 am XX FT, this is none of your business. Get over yourself. I am allowed to interpret anything anyway I want.XX Then you are no better than them. Tschus.