Безопасен ли cfact.org?

I get tired of WOT people giving sites a bad rating because they don't agree with the site's POLITICS. WOT is not meant to be a political forum! This is a fine site.

The reputation and usefulness of the Web of Trust service suffers greatly when think tanks and lobby groups get rated as unsafe. "Misleading claims" is not meant to refer to political opinions with which you disagree. There should be a "report" option so that false negative ratings that merely express political disagreement can be reviewed and corrected. "

Provides unvarnished truths about the efficacy of so-called alternative or renewable sources of energy, showing why those sources (as two Google Ph.D engineers found) will never amount to but a small percentage of our nation's energy needs. It provides some blowback to all those "greenies" pushing illogically for energy sources that simply are not reliable, nor cost effective and do not make engineering sense.

I guess people don't understand the content of a site is not what is rated unless it needs a child warning. Once again WOT is not an opinion tool for censorship. Ignore the warnings unless a reputable reviewer would like to put their name to their opinion. Technically this is a safe site.