Безопасен ли childhealthsafety.wordpress.com?

Anyone who gives a poor or questionable rating of this site is a PAID Big Pharma TROLL. Or just a pathetic idiot. They are dangerous to us and our children, who are getting sick and injured by the useless, toxic vaccinations that are designed to create an insane waterfall of $$$ for the companies that produce them. Vaccines do not work. Healthy diet and good hygiene works... unless you get a vax. Then, you get sick. Allergies, muscle pain, lethargy, asthma, etc... are only the mild, long term, side effects. Read this site, and do your own research, then come back here to rate this site, rate the others who TROLL this site, and get WOT to straighten out the problem TROLLS.

I got WOT because I thought it would help steer me away from websites with malicious code. Now, thanks to people who want me to listen to them, not the people on the website I'm trying to get information from, WOT is basically useless to me. I'm reading anti-vaccine info because it is contrary to what I've been told by the mainstream, including big gov and big pharma. Its called doing research, and I've found lots of things I wasn't told before. The number one problem with the vaccine story that has come to stick in my craw is that, apparently, all those big bad diseases they scare you with were long gone _before_ the vaccines were introduced. Unless you postulate that the vaccines are so powerful they can reach backward in time, this tells the whole story. Vaccines aren't necessary for good health - good nutrition, sanitation, exercise, in short, good clean living are sufficient for good health. Do you own research, and here's where I started: "Dissolving Illusions" by Dr. Suzzane Humphries.

The evidence this website has given has been debunked time and time again, as fraud, poor science/experimental design, or messy statistics. Go to Science Based Medicine or Quack Cast to hear the evidence and arguments that science offers. They represent the rigorous study that goes on with vaccines and the method of study that has shown they are safe and beneficial, using evidence.

The claim to give 'highly specific factual referenced reasoned justified information' is totally misleading. The authors of this site have taken highly specific facts and interpreted them in ways that cannot explain the full picture ot health and disease trends. Do not be worried by the nonsense presented here. The claims here are based on a narrow, and essentially very ignorant, selection process. The real explanations are very different, e.g. downward trends in mortality preceded almost all immunisations because, as health imporoved fewer of those who contracted a disease died becaus their health was better than in earlier times and health care was better. That absolutely does not mean the disease was dying out, or that it would have disappeared without immunisation.

I trust this web site as much as I trust ANY web site, which means: assess what it presents using the tools of rational thought. Just because a site provides controversial health information does not make it ipso facto untrustworthy. In principle, we all need to hear alternative views in order to avoid being duped by the prevailing consensus when it is wrong. That general perspective leaves open the question as to how much truth and/or error this web site presents.

Full of misinformation and lies about vaccination, this site is anti-science and anti-medicine and is a serious danger to public health and safety. If you care about your health and that of your children, avoid this site. If you don't give a shit about either, dive head first in to their stinking cesspool of disinformation. I've rated it "Hate, discrimination" because it promotes the most disgusting of all anti-vaccination lies: They claim Shaken Baby Syndrome is caused by vaccines! No, damn you, you filthy lying scum! SBS is caused by child abusers who beat, shake, and torture defenceless infants, and your obscene lies are giving an out to criminals who deserve to rot in jail for their crimes.

The site doesn't sell anything, so I really don't know how it gets a "vendor reliability" rating that is so poor. Trustworthiness is debatable, but also the ONLY rating category that it would be reasonable to give this site a poor rating for. It is entirely safe, as a website, for children (though the content would no doubt bore them). As to Privacy, there are no issues that I could detect. Once again, it seems that some rabid authoritarian types would like to censor any web site they don't agree with. This has and will, sadly, cause many people to not use WOT or take its ratings seriously. I can't say I blame them, at this point.

This blog cherry picks data. They ignore the fact that incidence of many disease weren't going down. Polio cases actually went up during the 1940s in the US but fell rapidly after the vaccine was introduced. See ***** The reason why mortality rates went down for Polio was because they put survivors in Iron Lungs which allowed those who had been severe disabled by the disease to survive. Tens of thousands of people were still left with permanent paralysis. Also ignored was that many diseases left a significant percentage of survivors with permanent damage. Mumps can cause sterility in males. Rubella can cause pregnant women to miscarried and cause birth defects if their child survives to birth. Smallpox left permanent scars on people's faces. Meningitis can leave permanent scarring all over the body. To those saying that such poor reviews are a misuse of WOT I would point out that giving a blog post filled with half-truths and downplays the risk of vaccine preventable disease doesn't fit into the definition of "trustworthy"

Very useful and informative site. Those who rated this site poorly; by all means, take the vaccinations and report back your results. Reporting your results will be useful and informative to all who already know what the agenda is; and, it will aid us in the calculation of statistics.

The negative comments here make no reference to web-safety (e.g., malware, virus-hosting, or excessive/illegitimate tracking). They amount to disagreements with the editorial policy of the site, which ought to be taken up elsewhere. In my opinion, such comments amount to abuse of the WOT process, and will, in sufficient numbers, erode the credibility of WOT.com.