Безопасен ли drwhitaker.com?

Anytime a website touts "prevention" "natural solutions", etc. the trolls come out. How can a website have 98% positive views and be rated unsatisfactory because of 2 or 3 negatives out of 4+ pages of comments? On these sites I'm learning to trust my instincts rather than WOT! I'm not a Scientologist but I've always found his information to be reliable and informative. My count on the ratings so far is 26 positive and 6 against Scientology.

I think there should be a separation on WOT between websites that are actually dangerous for you and your computer, and websites that just contain content some people don't agree with it. Just because you don't agree with what's said on a website doesn't mean it deserves to be given a bad rating for being untrustworthy, unsafe for children, etc... Think about it guys, it's just like when christians rate down an anti-christian website.

I can appreciate the concerns that anyone should have regarding any site that is connected with Scientology -- this one is NOT one of them! That said, the alternative treatments that are used / recommenced are scientifically sound, the products are superior, the information is cutting edge, and the concern for the health and well-being of their customers /patients is above reproach. I highly recommend this site!!

This site is safe. I have used it to my satisfaction. This is not the only website that has recieved an unfair bad review. One or two rieviews from anonymous writers dominates the overall rating while the majority of positive postings seem to have no statistcal effect on the rating. This is just another indication that WOT is a bogus service that allows a few cranks to trash a legit business. WOT should be sued for publishing such slander.And I Stand By My Statement.

I've been using Dr. Whitaker's products for years and have had great results. I don't know who in the world these other morons are that are posting red warnings but they are completely wrong. WOT should find out who they are and throw them off the chart!

I appreciate the information this site is connected with Scientology (though would like to see an actual link to such proof before it is labeled as such. Perhaps the label "ethical issues is correct, but that said, it's not helpful, nor is it right, to label this site is as a Phishing site minus any proof of Phishing activity ...nor it is helpful, nor right, to use the adjectives "hateful", "violent", or "illegal",, here again, minus any proof as to how the site demonstrates hatred and/or violence, and or illegal activity.