It seems that many are giving this site low ratings in all categories because they don't agree with the organisation and what it does. This is wrong and undermines WOT itself. The ratings are about the website itself - does the website have any privacy issues? Not that I could see.
Please make the distinction between whether you agree with the organisation, and whether the site itself has any of the problems listed or WOT will lose its reputation as a reliable source.
well-rated on charitynavigator.org for putting money toward activities that promote their goals (health of women and children) rather than to administrivia.
When a fully developed Human is delivered either through conventional mans, or through a Cesarian Operation, there is always a risk to the delivering mother that something *could* go wrong and the the Child might live, but the mother may die. Modern medical practice has reduced the risk of the death of the mother. To Prepare and be ready for a full term birth is an event that a woman must be prepared for, but unfortunately , *some* may not make , espescially if they have not sought help. IPPF helps with this education. Previous poster was incorrect about the assumptions on the help provided by IPPF