Безопасен ли jesus-is-savior.com?

This is quite a site. On the one hand, the site properly opposes abortion with some gusto, but this is true of many sites, but this one also opposes the use of medicine (see "Pharmageddon!"), the "Central Bank", Barack Obama, and other such things. It seems that they can't decide between a religious mission and a political one. Their savior, on the other hand, did not have such apprehensions as to what his sole mission was. Much of the material is a distillation of Alex Jones' various conspiracy theories, but also given a very strong religious slant. He justifies this with Psalm 94:16 and Ephesians 5:11. But Psalms is obviously a rhetorical question addressed to God, not to the owner of this site. In harmony with that, Isaiah 8:12, 13 says "“Do not say, ‘A conspiracy,’ Concerning all that this people call a conspiracy, Nor be afraid of their threats, nor be troubled. The Lord of hosts, Him you shall hallow; Let Him be your fear, And let Him be your dread." This is the NKJV. The KJV uses "confederacy," in this verse. But the KJV DOES say regarding a conspiracy at Jeremiah 11:9,11, that it is GOD who will "bring evil upon them, which they shall not be able to escape;". Preoccupying ourselves with such things is appealing, but God is more preoccupied than we will ever be, and much more capable of acting against them. Speaking from experience, the study of conspiracies simple sets Christians up for useless worry, and possibly even a subtle involvement in the occult, which hideously saturates these issues, and almost becomes required reading to understand them. I could not recommend such a study to any person. I can understand that they oppose Mariolatry, but they actually call "Catholic Mary" "the Great Whore," while deftly assuring the reader that "the mother of Jesus" ISN'T "the Great Whore." I find this too close for comfort, its theatrical, vicious, and seems to be for the sole purpose of MOCKING Catholics, under the thin guise of HELPING them. It's surprising that he fuses KJV-onlyism with an opposition to Catholicism. The King James Bible was translated by Anglican Churchmen (who belonged to a religion which prides itself as sitting on the fence as regards Protestantism and Catholicism - ***** It should also be noted that King James believed that Jesus was literally present in the communion host, and for this reason wanted his Presbyterian subjects to kneel before it. He also sent a Baptist named Thomas Helwys to prison for the remainder of his life, and had the Baptist Edward Wightman burned at the stake for heresy. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_I_of_England_and_religious_issues#Puritans) Regarding the site's KJV-onlyism, it should be noted that "You can view this website in Spanish, German, French, Italian, Korean, Chinese, Japanese, or Portuguese." The reason, of course, is that he is concerned for such people and, English speaking or not, he wants to save them. Certainly this is even more true with God. However, the KJV is, by definition, only available in English. In many countries, the only available translations are either Catholic, or based on the MSS that modern translations use (and which the site owner DETESTS). Even if the KJV itself were to be translated, by definition this would result in AT LEAST as many variations as there are between it and the NIV. Is it really reasonable to believe that all but the meager 360 million (scarcely 19% of humanity) have a "preserved" Bible for their use, while the remainder are apparently lost outright, unless they learn English AND us the KJV? The site says: "ALL Modern Bible Versions are Corrupt! "If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?" (Psalm 11:3) "- Is God really more concerned with such trivial nonsense as whether a Bible uses the word "Knowledge" rather than "Science", or "Bastard" rather than "Illegitimate", than he is with salvation billions of human beings? Putting it another way, to quote the Authorized Translators THEMSELVES- "For is the Kingdom of God become words or syllables? Why should wee be in bondage to them if we may be free...?" Most of their complaints about the new Bibles have absolutely nothing to do with what the original MSS say (and that is no exaggeration), but whether or not they consider some verse to be "powerful", or whether or not it was doctrinally appealing. An example that outrages him is: ***** , where he points out that the New World and New International Bibles both omit them, as an argument against the NIV. This is not a criteria worth being taken seriously. To demonstrate, Erasmus did not consider 1 John 5:7 to be worth including ( ***** ) , and his EXACT opinion regarding it was also held by Isaac Newton, an Arian. We cannon simply conclude from this that Erasmus was an Arian, when he was in fact a Catholic Priest! (which is essentially their assertion regarding the excluded verses) So it is reasonable to conclude that they both arrived at the conclusion for objective reasons, and that an individual's particular view of MSS IS NOT simply a "tell" for their beliefs. The site is very unreasonable, and self righteous to boot. Nothing here that is worth reading cannot be found elsewhere, and most of what is unique to this site shows a sloppy disregard for facts, instead resorting to emotionalism and dogmatic assertions. It is ironic that they are so anti-catholic and anti-charismatic. However, there are no viruses. Relating to abortion there are some explicit images, but nothing sexually explicit.

The negativity for this site is based off of opinion. While I believe nearly everything David J. Stewart has said on this site, this is not a religious debate, this is a website reputation "app". So, this site has NO malicious content, NO pornography, NO racism, NO hatred (except against sin), and NO spam/malware. The negativity is because people hate God and Christians and frankly... the truth.

I though this site was okay at first, it does have a lot of truth however since it has untrue statements inserted in various places I can not trust this site. Read and study your Bible and and you will see the errors. Best to go to another site. A half gospel is no gospel at all!

This site takes the truth and distorts it in a way to meet their own religious agenda. Blind hate fueled by combating facts like evolution and personal, alternate salvation. If there is a hell, these people who run this site will surely be going there. I see no difference between these Christian extremists and the type of people who blow themselves up with a suicide bomb.

I am a Christian, but I don't agree with many of the opinions on this site. That being said, they have the right to voice them. There is nothing untrustworthy about the site, especially as far as security, privacy, and "vendor reliability" go. Everyone giving bad ratings because they disagree with the opinions here needs to grow up.

An extremist christian website. It's totally safe, but not for children. It contains a lot of hate against pretty much everyone that isn't like them (gays, people that do abortions etc.). It sometimes even contains images of aborted babies, which are meant to be shocking for more sensitive people. Whether it's true or not depends on you.

Poorly researched hype. No real historical sources. Only texts taken out of context, and twisted to suit the preconceived ideas. Conspiracy theorist nuts who see the devil in anything they happen to disagree with. Claims to be evidence led, but this is far from the truth. Better watch out or you might be EXPOSED! too.

I don't agree with all of the author's views. However, that's no reason to give the site a bad rating. Grow up, folks.

This site challenges people to THINK! How sad that such a challenge can be classed as Hate! I am certain that those rating this site in such absurd ways have not bothered to read it. This does not mean that I agree with everything here - it means that I agree that people have a right to ask others to Think! If you don't like to think, then please stick with Barbie sites!