Безопасен ли jihadwatch.org?

this website has some very well thought out and intelligently conveyed ideas; for people who like to think and reason before judging. those who give it a bad rating only do so because they wish to ignore the dark side of islam and thus perpetuate its existence.

If you love your country, value your freedom (if you live in a free country) and want to know what is REALLY happening with the worldwide jihad that can, has been, and will continue to affect all of us, this site is a must see--along with Atlasshrugs<dot>com, two of the best sites reporting on Islamic jihad, and how it is already changing the world for the worse. Get educated now so that you can make a difference--or start learning Arabic, and quickly.

Not only is this website boring, incredibly flawed but it rehashes many medieval arguments against Islam. The writer, who is a Catholic, just cannot admit that he lost the Crusades and continues to fight, even after Pope John Paul II (May he rest in Peace) admits the Islam is a legitimate path to God. Furthermore, the site is funded by a Jew (David Horowitz) who supports Israel. Not all Jews hate Islam, but only the ones who sympathise with Israel. Their ultimate motive is to discredit Islam by convincing the West that they want to take over just so that they may last in their illegal state for a few more years. In my opinion, this is a pretty bad tactic and can only come from the most extreme zionists. True Jews will realise that Islam is not their enemy, it's just a little angry that it has to pick up the bill for Christian anti-semitism and the Holocaust. Overall, this site is repetitive, it records an instant of extremism from the Muslim world or even the West and marks it as proof that Muslims want global domination. This sounds very similar to the anti-semitic work "The Protocols of The Elders of Zion" that alleges that Jews are trying to take over the world. This sie is deeply Islamophobic, a label that causes Mr.Spencer to soil his pants. Nonetheless, it is an appropriate descriptor for a site that wants its readers to commit a holocaust against their Muslim neighbours. It incites "action" but leaves the definition up to the reader. The site has also endorsed the EDL, a violent organisation that could soon begin attacking innocent Muslims in the UK. Clearly, the site is engaged in its own jihad to eradicate the Muslims. Overall, this site is violent and hateful and should not be allowed. Of course, freedom of speech is why this site isn't already banned. This is hypocritical since Mein Kampf is banned in many countries, yet no one questions whether this destroys Hitler's right to freedom of speech.