Безопасен ли nytimes.com?

For sure, I know that this company don`t need to bother me, because I'm living in another country. But, lemme tell you one thing, NY times isn`t worth calling themselves an unbiased news agency. Maybe, I dunno the real things, cuz I`m an insider or sort of, but from the third party side, it looks absolutely foolish. I know something about politics and can claim that some news companies are bribed to use their communication channels for sympathizing with a certain party. How it`s possible to trust them and their broadcast information after that, even though they reach promptly.

Don't want to claim that New york times are the best medium out there, but it's definitely better than other medium like the Guardian. Abundance of topics makes me binge-read articles, get essential information and absorb it, like... to understand where I can potentially apply receive knowledge and this is inspiring for real. Some people prefer reading books to get knowledge, others, like myself, prefer to read newspapers and various articles from experts of the industry. IDK, for me th latter approach is better.

I used to have a better opinion of this site until the recent (2016) demonstration of editorial bias that has eclipsed their role as reporting news and put them squarely into the role of attempting to create news and shape public opinion for the sake of a political agenda (the blatant campaigning for Hilary Clinton and subsequent demeaning reportage of Senator Sanders). As it is, this paper is now more in the mold of a Hearst-style, dynastic mouthpiece for special interests, thus is not an unbiased source of news. Editorial oversight is problematic in that reporting on current events is too often tainted with issues of libel and character assassination, for example, the initial reporting on Alec Baldwin's involvement in a fatal on-set shooting with an alleged prop-gun which pointedly described Baldwin's previous unrelated encounters with the police. Article comments are not just heavily moderated, the editors selectively pick comments from a select group of commentors who are a de facto part of the NY Times editorial oversight while ignoring other comments or deleting them hours after being posted. This site uses an aggressive paywall as well. Much of the reporting is still of higher quality than many papers, only one should read it carefully and be aware of these problems regarding bias.