Безопасен ли rationalwiki.org?

Not a reliable site for TRUTH. openly chides true Christianity, not understanding Scripture because it has not been revealed to them by GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT.

Полезный

a.schueler.design

rationalwiki.org berichtet einseitig atheistisch. Argumente der Gegenseite werden komplett unterschlagen!

Полезный

Catherine Conrad

They seem to have nothing good to say about anyone. It's just a raunchy humor site, I guess. At least, I'm certain they find the site funny. It's all insult humor. To each his own.

johnhaverysamuel

Dismantles the cranks. Warning, may contain sarcasm.

Полезный

d914gj+4dumqkghj3yvgc

5 лет назад

Great anti-pseudoscience, anti-quackery, anti-authoritarianism resource! Rational Wiki is slightly biased pro-left no doubt. There are, however, some articles that do criticize the left or other people besides just white conservatives: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antifascist_Action#Internal_divisions https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch#Motte_and_bailey https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Black_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Female_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Hard_green https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moralistic_fallacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shoehorning#Politics https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_media_platforms#Tumblr https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center#Criticism RW does have fair share of opinion crept in, though, ought to be noted. Thankfully, like Wikipedia, there sometimes is the "Citation needed" -note in place where a citation hasn't been added. Oftentimes citations can be found. Sections on logical arguments are gold! Recommended alongside many other sources.

gareth edwards

5 лет назад

With the pervasiveness of misinformation, half truths and outright lies to be found in social media it is absolutely necessary that sites like this exist to inform and educate and to foster critical thinking.

Sake Bomb

5 лет назад

Not exactly the most accurate, but very entertaining.

Shoggoth

Site satirique combattant diverses pseudosciences. Ne cache pas ses prise de position.

A440

This is a good and useful site since it promotes rational thought and helps debunks some of the more pernicious lies, disinformation campaigns and other poison that can be found on the internet. I would consider this child-friendly as well since one would want their children to be wise and think for themselves.

The Doge

This website is run by feminists, which means that everything in this article is biased against male. Use this site for humor only.

Lizzie G. F.

Some language (e.g., bulls--t). View it before your kids do.

David Thensin

Worst of the worst regressive left propaganda. Site even promotes pedophilia. Sick fucks. Not safe for children at all.

OneTwoThreeFour

Whether it is a joke or somebody actually believes crazy stuff they write on this site, it should be marked as such instead of masquerading as a wikipedia-type page.

wildarmor

I'll start with an edited tweet by Anita Sarkeesian. ***** Metapedia has poor ratings because it's (at least it seems to be) a Neo-nazi wiki. Rationalwiki may not take itself seriously, but it deserves to be treated equally to its slightly less rational counterparts.

Полезный

anarchic teapot

Very informative, covers the main areas of pseudoscience (religious or otherwise), conspiracy theories and alien-spotting. Calls a spade a spade.

Moodkill