Not a reliable site for TRUTH. openly chides true Christianity, not understanding Scripture because it has not been revealed to them by GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT.
They seem to have nothing good to say about anyone.
It's just a raunchy humor site, I guess. At least, I'm certain they find the site funny. It's all insult humor. To each his own.
Great anti-pseudoscience, anti-quackery, anti-authoritarianism resource!
Rational Wiki is slightly biased pro-left no doubt. There are, however, some articles that do criticize the left or other people besides just white conservatives:
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antifascist_Action#Internal_divisions
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch#Motte_and_bailey
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Black_supremacy
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Female_supremacy
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Hard_green
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moralistic_fallacy
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shoehorning#Politics
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_media_platforms#Tumblr
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center#Criticism
RW does have fair share of opinion crept in, though, ought to be noted. Thankfully, like Wikipedia, there sometimes is the "Citation needed" -note in place where a citation hasn't been added. Oftentimes citations can be found.
Sections on logical arguments are gold!
Recommended alongside many other sources.
With the pervasiveness of misinformation, half truths and outright lies to be found in social media it is absolutely necessary that sites like this exist to inform and educate and to foster critical thinking.
This is a good and useful site since it promotes rational thought and helps debunks some of the more pernicious lies, disinformation campaigns and other poison that can be found on the internet.
I would consider this child-friendly as well since one would want their children to be wise and think for themselves.
Whether it is a joke or somebody actually believes crazy stuff they write on this site, it should be marked as such instead of masquerading as a wikipedia-type page.
I'll start with an edited tweet by Anita Sarkeesian.
*****
Metapedia has poor ratings because it's (at least it seems to be) a Neo-nazi wiki.
Rationalwiki may not take itself seriously, but it deserves to be treated equally to its slightly less rational counterparts.
No viruses or any other sort. However, it is terribly biased towards third wave feminism/atheism :
"Christina Hoff Sommers (born 1950) is a self-declared feminist"
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Christina_Hoff_Sommers
-Note the word "self-declared"
Questionable use of language and is also a for-atheism site. I am not religious, but Wikipedia is a better source of unbiased information than this site.
TL;DR
Website is safe, information is slightly biased
1
1234
О приложении
Мы просмотрели более 2 миллионов веб-сайтов, и их число продолжает расти. WOT — это легкое расширение, разработанное, чтобы помочь вам быстро и безопасно просматривать веб-страницы. Он очистит ваш браузер, ускорит его работу и защитит вашу личную информацию.
Это ваш сайт?
Заявите права на свой веб-сайт, чтобы получить доступ к бизнес-инструментам WOT и связаться с вашими клиентами.