Безопасен ли rationalwiki.org?

Пользуется доверием у сообщества WOT

4.4
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(76 отзывов)
Хороший сайт
Мнения, религия, политика
Заявить права на сайт
Задать вопрос сообществу
Поделиться:

rationalwiki.org

4.4
starstarstarstarhalf-star
(76 отзывов)
Защитите свой телефон
1. Получайте оповещения о небезопасных сайтах.
2. Блокируйте контент для взрослых.
3. Оставайтесь в безопасности на ходу.
Поделитесь своим мнением...
starempty-star
Плохо
starempty-star
Нормально
starempty-star
Средне
starempty-star
Хорошо
starempty-star
Отлично
76 отзывов
Сортировать по:
Новые
Самая надежная онлайн-защита
Bobby Lawson
26 дек. 2019 г.
26 дек. 2019 г.
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
Not bad, but it does seems to have a leftist slant sometimes to its detriment
Kay Cude
17 авг. 2019 г.
17 авг. 2019 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Not a reliable site for TRUTH. openly chides true Christianity, not understanding Scripture because it has not been revealed to them by GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT.
a.schueler.design
6 мар. 2019 г.
6 мар. 2019 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
rationalwiki.org berichtet einseitig atheistisch. Argumente der Gegenseite werden komplett unterschlagen!
Catherine Conrad
17 февр. 2019 г.
17 февр. 2019 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
They seem to have nothing good to say about anyone. It's just a raunchy humor site, I guess. At least, I'm certain they find the site funny. It's all insult humor. To each his own.
johnhaverysamuel
25 сент. 2018 г.
25 сент. 2018 г.
starstarstarstarstar
Dismantles the cranks. Warning, may contain sarcasm.
d914gj+4dumqkghj3yvgc
22 июня 2018 г.
22 июня 2018 г.
starstarstarstarstar
Great anti-pseudoscience, anti-quackery, anti-authoritarianism resource! Rational Wiki is slightly biased pro-left no doubt. There are, however, some articles that do criticize the left or other people besides just white conservatives: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Antifascist_Action#Internal_divisions https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch#Motte_and_bailey https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Black_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Female_supremacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Hard_green https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moralistic_fallacy https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Shoehorning#Politics https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_justice_warrior https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Social_media_platforms#Tumblr https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Southern_Poverty_Law_Center#Criticism RW does have fair share of opinion crept in, though, ought to be noted. Thankfully, like Wikipedia, there sometimes is the "Citation needed" -note in place where a citation hasn't been added. Oftentimes citations can be found. Sections on logical arguments are gold! Recommended alongside many other sources.
gareth edwards
25 февр. 2018 г.
25 февр. 2018 г.
starstarstarstarstar
With the pervasiveness of misinformation, half truths and outright lies to be found in social media it is absolutely necessary that sites like this exist to inform and educate and to foster critical thinking.
Sake Bomb
15 окт. 2017 г.
15 окт. 2017 г.
Not exactly the most accurate, but very entertaining.
Shoggoth
18 июня 2017 г.
18 июня 2017 г.
starstarstarstarempty-star
Site satirique combattant diverses pseudosciences. Ne cache pas ses prise de position.
A440
25 мар. 2017 г.
25 мар. 2017 г.
starstarstarstarstar
This is a good and useful site since it promotes rational thought and helps debunks some of the more pernicious lies, disinformation campaigns and other poison that can be found on the internet. I would consider this child-friendly as well since one would want their children to be wise and think for themselves.
The Doge
25 дек. 2016 г.
25 дек. 2016 г.
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
This website is run by feminists, which means that everything in this article is biased against male. Use this site for humor only.
Lizzie G. F.
9 дек. 2016 г.
9 дек. 2016 г.
starstarstarhalf-starempty-star
Some language (e.g., bulls--t). View it before your kids do.
David Thensin
31 мар. 2016 г.
31 мар. 2016 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Worst of the worst regressive left propaganda. Site even promotes pedophilia. Sick fucks. Not safe for children at all.
OneTwoThreeFour
19 дек. 2015 г.
19 дек. 2015 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Whether it is a joke or somebody actually believes crazy stuff they write on this site, it should be marked as such instead of masquerading as a wikipedia-type page.
wildarmor
4 дек. 2015 г.
4 дек. 2015 г.
I'll start with an edited tweet by Anita Sarkeesian. http://i.imgur.com/pFsUupa.png Metapedia has poor ratings because it's (at least it seems to be) a Neo-nazi wiki. Rationalwiki may not take itself seriously, but it deserves to be treated equally to its slightly less rational counterparts.
anarchic teapot
30 нояб. 2015 г.
30 нояб. 2015 г.
starstarstarstarhalf-star
Very informative, covers the main areas of pseudoscience (religious or otherwise), conspiracy theories and alien-spotting. Calls a spade a spade.
Moodkill
20 нояб. 2015 г.
20 нояб. 2015 г.
No viruses or any other sort. However, it is terribly biased towards third wave feminism/atheism : "Christina Hoff Sommers (born 1950) is a self-declared feminist" http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Christina_Hoff_Sommers -Note the word "self-declared" Questionable use of language and is also a for-atheism site. I am not religious, but Wikipedia is a better source of unbiased information than this site. TL;DR Website is safe, information is slightly biased
Ryaniskira
30 окт. 2015 г.
30 окт. 2015 г.
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
They bias here is amazing. The info here is mostly factual but cherry-picked so any factuality is canceled out. They slander and bash anyone who does not share their Atheism+ SJWhiner viewpoints regardless of what those groups/people believe.
Apollo702
20 окт. 2015 г.
20 окт. 2015 г.
starstarstarstarhalf-star
This is a wiki that catalogs all kinds of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience. Naturally a portion of the population such as flat Earthers are really really going to hate it. Bookmarked.
Starm4nn
8 июля 2015 г.
8 июля 2015 г.
starstarstarstarstar
Contains many examples of logic and arguments against religion.
«
123
...
4
»

О сайте

Благонадёжность
88
/100
безопасность для детей
84
/100