Безопасен ли teaparty.org?

Self-proclaimed socialist here- Americans would call me a 'liberal'- I don't agree with anything this website states, but cannot fault its safety to access. I find many of its claims dubious at best so am not giving it an 'I trust' rating. However, website contains no viruses and for the limited purposes of WoT should be considered safe. I don't believe it should be taken down or restricted in any way but I remind users of the importance of fact-checking what you read on the internet, especially claims made on such a hyperpartisan website as this one- as such I have given it the 'misleading claims' label- not because I disagree with it politically but because the stories this website contains are often factually incorrect or manipulated. Stories on this website should not be taken as objectively correct news but as politically-motivated propaganda, similar to the websites of many radical political movements across the spectrum. Read with caution, but access the website with no concern.

The site is harmless. I haven't used their fax blast, but if I had more money, I might. I'd rather use: ***** for free. Teaparty.org's fax blast might be more effective. But the yellow WOT rating seems to come from political opponents. Ghostery shows only 2 trackers: 1 for site analytics 1 for social media not much compared to most sites. Information from third-party sources (0)

I don't understand why the few obvious political opinion ratings among all the actual safety related ratings bring the over all rating down, but whatever. The site is safe in regards to viruses, trojans, children, and everything else WOT is designed to flag. If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels. A liberal/progressive demands that those they don't like be shut down. -- paraphrased from somewhere. Sorry I don't recall who said it first.

Everyone has an opinion on issues in life or politics, religion, sex, etc. WOT should not mark the ***** website as 'UNSATISFACTORY' rating without proof and posting a link to same. The grading of a political website or that offers political opinions is the free exercise of the 1st Amendment. The 'UNSATISFACTORY' rating is Censorship clear and simple. To many people fail to get the truth and go with whatever the media or internet ratings provide. This is because many people have been living a comfortable life and have a herd mentality.

Simply speaking a site is not untrustworthy because you are on the opposite end of the political spectrum if so the dailykos the democratic underground and think progress all need a similar rating . I have yet to see that happen here so fairness is not a trait of wos

There are no virus or safety hazzards that I have found with this site. There is nothing here that is inappropriate for children. It seems those giving this site bad marks are merely the politcal opposition. That's fascist tyranny. And it only seems to be one side that is out doing that, so that tells you something right there.

Misleading titles that push a biased view, such as the article on a gun store owner being asked to hand over his Facebook password. It focuses on minutia of situations to make it seem like the people in question are oppressed somehow. It also uses Fox News commentary in replacement of reported facts, which is highly misleading. No, I am not a "liberal." This website uses misleading claims.