Безопасен ли thunderbolts.info?

Despite the primitive critics some people have on the content of this site, it is up to you to prove the content. Some citations may redirect to themselves, because it is a complete new cosmological view. But who is the first one to be citated? Citations do not verify statements. It is the interaction of logical consistency and observable facts which are verifying statements. If you carefully follow the space explorations of NASA and ESA you will see that the collected new data prove some predictions the EU proponents made. Best example: They predicted there will be no ice on the comet C-G. Since they landed on it some "Iceball"-proponents had to admit, that their theory about iceballs was wrong. Just to defame the authors of this page as sheer "nutcases" who just want to tell the world, that all astrophysicists are wrong, is just pure insulting and there is nothing to discuss about such unchallenged minds.

completely unscientific site promoting an 'electric universe' where gravity is an illusion. I wish it was satire, but many people really believe this. All it's proof has citations either to its own site, other woo sites, or some mangled science report in the popular press - not particularly credible methods.

Very interesting experience navigating the universe understood as an electrical phenomenon. The new data from space probes tend to confirm this mode. One example discussed on this site is the THEMIS observatory which has confirmed the existence of the "Birkeland Currents" (electrical currents" between earth and the sun. Though traditional astronomers are continually expressing surprise at the data coming in from space, there are other examples of such data confirming the predictions of the Electric Universe model. It may be time to modify some of the assumptions that were made about space, planets and stars before the invention of the sophisticated instrumentation that is now being deployed in orbit and beyond.