Безопасен ли virtapay.com?

Сайт прост и интересен.Отнеситесь к нему как к игре.Вы просто не поняли, как можно использовать этот сайт! Можно и не покупать продукт Click Bank за 17 $. Дети могут использовать этот сайт, как виртуальную платежную систему.Обычная жадность, вот что вами движет! Это забавная пустышка, взгляните на нее с другой стороны.

Скорость работы в стадии разработки очень низка. Если даже и откроется - обслуживать платежи тоже будут так медленно? Неясно, почему такие нерасторопные. 350 000 user x 20$ DAY = 7 000 000& DAY 350 000 user x year-год = 2 555 000 000$ YEAR-ГОД!!!! ПОХОЖЕ ЛАЖА!

.More of years ago (April 20011) this "payment system" must be launched! Now it's 2012 VirtaPay! And still in prelaunch! Former name Paybox - must be launched in January 2011. I think it not be lauched NEVER! $$ of this system not realy dollars! For what purpose made this scam?

I've been involved with ***** from first appearance as PayBox.com. New currency transfer program in the making, now nearing its final stages. See their Blogs and take note - the nonbelievers (so called Gurus) who spat bile in the beginning stages have gone quiet. Customer experiences can be good or bad - it is people advertising digital products and we buy with VirtaPay Dollars so there can be no money losses due to the program - only due to people advertising rubbish! One is warned to ensure the advert is not flagged. This is a good site and will be going live any time now. Read their Blogs!

Ob Gauner oder nicht, entscheidet sich erst, wenn WIRKLICH vernünftige Sachen gekauft werden können (z.B. bei Amazon oder e-bay u.s.w.). Scams or honest people, that we will see only, if we can buy thnings from amazon, ebay or other wellknown firms. Schlecht, daß man keine Anrtwort über "contact" erhalten kann! Bad, because no answer is possible about the "contact-link"

virtapay.com was spammed in November, 2011 When you tell the registrar ENOM about their problem, you get the same old irresponsible buck-passing duck-shoving fob-off - "we are only the registrar - complain to the hosting ISP" - as if that exonerated them from ethical responsibility. You can see countless examples like this at the ENOM spammed domains blacklist published constantly at ***** - when you compare ENOM with other registrars they show the worst record for support of high volume spamming. Typically about 50% of domains registered at Demand Media's ENOM is detected in unlawful spam (46% - 1140 of 2478). ENOM is sponsoring this illegal spamming operation, and accepts payments for the unlawful domain name registrations. Where Go Daddy has shown corporate responsibility, ENOM shows corporate irresponsibility. And toothless ICANN accredits them, while pocketing the accreditation fees. Some would accuse ENOM of providing a safe harbor for crime. Others would wonder if there is any vestigial trace of ethics at ICANN.