Безопасен ли washingtontimes.com?

Misleading site name intended to deceive people into thinking that the site is mainstream media. The name is just clickbait for another alt-right American formed white supremacist site that promotes pro-assad regime propaganda and blames the regime's murders on its victims. Sadly, the new "conservative" face of white Americans is pro-assad, pro-iran, and pro-russia. Today's right wing American "conservatives" support genocidal dictators supported by communist regimes like russia, china, and north korea all while claiming to stand for freedom, justice, and equality. White supremacist christian fundamentalist lies and deception.

14web bugs?!?!......... For real??? An article for "Best new firearms for 2016"??? Another about "Bang for your buck:Best handguns under $500"?? This site has just lost all my trust! Y'all should be ashamed of yourself! We need gun CONTROL.....not Gun Advocacy!

The site is very biased. Clearly they are aiming at males not only by the tone- but by including tons of girly pictures. Then there are things like, the pro-Christian, pro guns... culture. Then again, to sell right wing you have to appeal to over 70 white males. That is the face of conservatism. Interestingly enough, despite being completely biased- unlike most contemporary right-wing sites it didn't take the bait of going completely gonzo over the top in it's zeal. For that reason it actually is slightly better than most in it's class.

Site has an unannounced copy & paste hijack to append its URL (and twitter account) to any content pasted. The hijack comes with carriage returns before the URL, which is a bit frustrating when you're talking about the article with someone who linked you to it (...and already knows the URL) in a chat clients where a carriage return sends the message. ;)