A climate change denialists website promoting fiction as fact, lies as truth and distortion as reality. Individuals are frequently ridiculed and criticised with no right of reply. Very little of the content is credible and most of the opinion is extremely suspect.
This site attempts to disprove anthropogenic global warming climate change by citing opinions from conservative outlets, meteorologists, and other non-experts. Instead of accepting the actual science that is accepted by the IPCC, NASA, NOAA, EPA, and dozens of other organizations throughout the world, this site simply denies the truth.
Every claim made on this site has been debunked at Skeptical Science: http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php
The following sites are excellent sources of information for those who actually want to learn about anthropogenic climate change:
The 2013 Climate Science Archive at Nature Magazine (peer-reviewed science journal) has references for all climate studies done in 2013:
The best skeptic site on the Internet to stay up to date on the climate science debate. Anthony Watts does a tremendous job providing daily new content. If there is one site you should check everyday this is it.
One of the best science sites on the web. Has won countless blog and other awards.
Regularly posts material that in my opinion exposes alarmist views for what they are and shows a realistic viewpoint on most climate and other science based news. It has a number of well known guest writers that are renowned experts in their fields and allows novice writers to post too.
This is a site I visit every day.
This site reaches a different conclusion than the Groupthinked AGW alarmists parrots that seek to censor opposing conclusions. Cites peer reviewed articles. Do your own research, and make your own opinion. The site is clean, safe for all ages. Debunks SkepticalScience and most of the AGW theories.
This is a website that promotes pseudoscience. Unfortunately, they have registered WOT users to tilt the rating toward positive.
Please note the majority of scientists, historians of science, and philosophers of science find it a sad situation. This reflects the official position of major science societies in Great Britain and the US.
Ample evidence exists and is overwhelming. Linking to journals is not worthwhile as most readers don't have access. However you can visit realclimate.org which is run by a group of climatologists who have credentials that overwhelm anyone cited at this website. Gavin Schmidt, Michael Mann, Susan Solomon, and many others.
Global Warming denial pseudoscience designed to bamboozle the befuddled with sciencey sounding but scientifically unsound arguments against the increasingly hard to ignore evidence for man-made global warming.
This site is a creation of right-wing anti-science zealots -- climate change deniers -- whose assertions can easily be proved wrong, if not outright lies, and who engage in the most nasty, heinous and despicable personal attacks on world-renowned scientists of impeccable credentials.
Indeed, one of their favorite targets, Dr. Michael Mann, director of the Earth System Science Center at Pennsylvania State University, is suing two of this site's cronies for defamation, which suit just cleared a major hurtle to proceed in DC Superior Court -- http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/01/michael-mann-climategate-court-victory .
Stay away, far away -- especially children.
Denialist propaganda site. If Watts has legitimate criticisms of the climate science consensus then perhaps he should submit them to peer review like those he attacks. As he does not, publishing instead on a blog, readers should take this slack of the courage of conviction into account before accepting anything he says.
WUWT is an astroturf site for disseminating falsehoods about the human agency (CO2 emissions) behind global warming. Anthony Watts and his followers have been proven liars repeatedly and across many aspects of climate science. Readers are directed to more reputable sites such as skepticalscience.com where the arguments promoted at WUWT are routinely debunked, by practising scientists referring to peer-reviewed research.
WUWT exemplifies fake scepticism: there is very little self-critical discourse here, and a great deal of confirmation-bias. The agenda of denying AGW is ultimately political, and motivated by protecting vested interests in the fossil fuel industry. Arguments purporting to undermine any and all aspects of climate science are uncritically supported in discussions and postings at Watts' site, regardless of their factual or logical deficiencies.
On a scale of trustworthiness as a source for information about climate science, WUWT scores a big fat goose egg, already cracked, and stinking with rot.
Excellent site with a wide variety of both scientific and lay postings. Good backup from a well informed and well qualified field of commentators. Many who are major players in their specialist fields of atmospheric science, statistics, economics, energy research, computer science etc. Well worth anyone with an open mind taking a look and joining in. No welcome here for drive by trolls and spammers.
This is a valuable, reliable site with thousands of informative posts/articles. A frequent stop on my visits to the WorldWideWeb.
note: the negative comments here (below on WOT) are not at all about internet security or consumer security on the site, but rather about some users' disapproval of the views and information presented on the site. There are spammy comments here attacking the site's outlook, but no actual information or thought (so far) which could help any impartial observer to form a sound judgment about this site.
No virus, no annoying ads, no security threats, no conspiracy theories, just a different point of view than the mainstream. Some people want to rate this site as untrustworthy just because they are absolutely convinced that Global Warming has no other cause than human footprint. Hey, this is no religion but science, so there is no room for haters. The scientific community is not even convinced but some people outsmart them. This page reveals some of the malpractice being made to correlate Global Warming with YOUR lifestyle. YOU are being accused, your footprint is to blame, even the energy YOU are wasting to censor this post and worse, you are to be TAXED for this. So if you believe in AGW so badly and think GW is so bad, then stay off the internet, trash your car, your oven, your freezer, your water heater, your grill, all your appliances, then grab a bicycle and go get fresh groceries and better have a job at a walking distance. Come on, this site is worth reading so, stop censoring, there should be no Siberia in the internet.
One of the best science sites available. Always totally honest, evaluates data in an impartial way. Does indeed go against what many call "consensus" in the climate debate, but in every case supported by real data and measurments.
The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change