Безопасен ли wolfsonintegrativecardiology.com?

Ignore the red WOT (Web Of Trust) rating. Drug industry trolls are again  trashing the WOT rating for a site that questions the safety and efficacy of vaccines. How much do they get paid to give bad WOT ratings to such sites as this? "This site doesn't appear in third-party sources."

I rated this site as "I Trust" but for whatever reason WOT is not recognizing this. This site does not contain spam, malicious programming, or content not suitable for children. Anyone can take one sentence out of context of the entire dialogue and make someone sound horrible. The bad reviews are based on personal beliefs and misinformed opinions. It would be nice if people could learn to speak from an informed, educated, and compassionate standpoint rather than constantly saturating comment zones with angry, uninformed rants. EDUCATE YOURSELVES! I was also under the impression that WOT was for keeping us informed about whether sites might harm our computers or contain content obviously not suitable for children such as pornography. If WOT is now going to become just another platform for people to rage and spew their opinions on others I will most likely delete it. I'll be checking more site ratings and comments to determine this. Freedom of speech ring a bell with anyone here?

As far as I can tell, the opinions expressed on this website are clearly opinions, and not stated as facts. The negative reviews are obviously personal attacks against the website sponsor and not based on any other factor. You should treat those reviews for what they are.