Is dt07.net Safe?

2.5
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
(8 Reviews)
Privacy Risk
Claim this site
Ask our community
Share:

dt07.net

2.5
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
(8 Reviews)
Protect Your Phone
1. Get alerts about unsafe websites.
2. Block adult content.
3. Stay safe on the go.
Share your thoughts...
starempty-star
Poor
starempty-star
Fair
starempty-star
Average
starempty-star
Good
starempty-star
Excellent
8 Reviews by the community
Sort by:
Newest
A Safer Browsing Experience.
Everywhere, Anytime.
The most trustworthy online protection
Oct 16, 2016
starstarhalf-starempty-starempty-star
Unlike dt02.net, dt04.net, dt05.net, and dt06.net this site wasn't compromised. Unlike the list above dt07.nt uses nginx, a reverse proxy which is used to increase performance by caching websites. It will not cache executables by default, nginx has external semi-hiddeb links that contains cachable items like javascript. Risks of javascript includes ads and privacy risks. The review tools below do not scan hidden links, the commenters should inspect the html source to find those. I would not enable javascript for this site, the nginx itself is safe, but be cautious which hidden javascript files you open. So whether you can trust it depends on the site you visited and the particular script. Example: http://jsc.dt07.net/l/o/longfiles.com.4419.js
Helpful
Mar 3, 2015
I'll vote "Positive / Neutral", for either the website, dt07.net, seems to not exist, as another MyWot user already posted, or it's just WoT that's preventing the website from loading after I said to le me go to the website. But, another reason for the choice of vote is because of not getting any negative reports from the following testers: McAfee Threat Center, http://www.mcafee.com/us/threat-center.aspx Norton Safe Web, http://safeweb.norton.com/report/show?url=dt07.net Trendmicro Safety Center, http://global.sitesafety.trendmicro.com/index.php http://www.urlvoid.com, https://www.virustotal.com, where the last analysis was performed on February 26th Zulu URL Risk Analyzer, http://zulu.zscaler.com The Zulu report for the analysis it just performed on dt07.net is at the following url. I don't know if the url will be good for long, but loading it in a separate tab in Firefox and then in Opera produces pages for the same report. http://zulu.zscaler.com/submission/show/168c42bc2a641aafb0c1e1042e9b5a0d-1425344686 Trying to have VirusTotal.com do the analysis again, rather than just checking the report from an analysis someone ran last week, has an unusual effect. It causes redirection to dt07.net, rather than just scanning the website and then presenting the resulting report. The same thing happens when I try to use Comodo's tester, which used to be at http://siteinspector.comodo.com/public/tasks/new but it now redirects to the following url: http://app.webinspector.com/recent_detections Actually, while dt07.net is loaded in both cases, this is with my main Firefox profile for which plenty of extensions/add-ons are installed and perhaps one or more of them are causing the problem; because, trying Opera, it works correctly. Here's the link for the report of results from the Comodo analysis I just ran using Opera and it says safe, plus "No malicious activity or malware detected" and more details : http://app.webinspector.com/public/reports/30644987 According to the following article, Comodo's website inspector can take a while to run because it performs "an in-depth real-time analysis of the site to check for any possibly malicious content": "How to Tell If A Website Is Dangerous", Updated 9. June 2014 - 15:34 by Chiron, http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/how-tell-if-website-dangerous.htm In-depth analysis is what's needed. Reputation is about opinions, whereas reports from in-depth malware analyses of websites has nothing to do with opinions or certainly isn't, shouldn't be anyway, significantly based on opinions. It should be real scanning for potential malware. AdBlock Plus can be used for blocking ads and, if not mistaken, also pop-ups. When Virustotal and Comodo's inspector while using Firefox redirected for loading dt07.net, Firefox didn't report that the website is untrusted, so there's also this additional check, even if it's unintentional for the browser user. So, my vote of "Positive / Neutral" really is for neutral, but MyWoT.com should split positive and neutral, or create a "Neutral", "I don't know" or "Unsure" option; separately. These votes shouldn't cause WoT to block the loading of Web domains. And why is MyWoT.com quoting user comments when it's already clear that these are user comments, rather than content from MyWoT.com? I've never seen any other website placing quotes around a commentator's comments, except for excerpts or citations.
Helpful
Nov 12, 2011
starstarstarstarstar
Нормальные сайт, читаю всегда на английском и перехожу по новостям, можно сказать учу по нему английский
Helpful
Sep 27, 2011
starempty-starempty-starempty-starempty-star
Purely the fact that there are automated reviews posted here tells me that this is a bad site. It's going strictly on my blacklist.
Helpful
6
Aug 9, 2011
starstarstarstarstar
Nothing here to harm the kids.
Helpful
2
Aug 9, 2011
Allows sites to use a proxy service.
Helpful
2
Aug 9, 2011
Nothing wrong here.
Helpful
1
Mar 21, 2011
starstarstarempty-starempty-star
This site is used on http://www.conceivablytech.com/ VirusTotal said that this site didn't have any problems: http://www.virustotal.com/url-scan/report.html?id=87d1cb82e620e8d94b9e6bf9def7a5b6-1300670137
Helpful
1

About this site

Trustworthiness
49
/100
Child Safety
52
/100
This site uses cookies for analytics and personalised content. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to this use. Learn More
Accept