mostholyfamilymonastery.comは安全ですか?

不明なウェブサイト

ウェブサイトのセキュリティスコア

53%
WOT のセキュリティ スコアは、当社独自のテクノロジーとコミュニティの専門家によるレビューに基づいています。
このウェブサイトは申請済みですか?
いいえ
コミュニティレビュー
★ 3.1
WOTのアルゴリズム
62%
子供の安全性
該当なし

コミュニティは何と言っていますか?

レビューを残す

このウェブサイトを1から5の間で、どのように評価しますか?
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
starempty-star
フィードバックを共有してコミュニティに貢献しましょうレビューは少なくとも15文字で構成されている必要がありますこのウェブサイトを最もよく表すタグを選択してください
マルウェアあるいはウイルス
顧客サービスが悪い
フィッシング
詐欺
違法の可能性がある
誤解を招くあるいは倫理に反している
プライバシーリスク
不審
憎悪、差別的
スパム
潜在的に迷惑なプログラム
広告/ポップアップ
アダルトコンテンツ
卑猥な可能性がある
残酷あるいは刺激的
キャンセル
レビューの投稿
3.1
starstarstarempty-starempty-star

9のレビューに基づく

並び順:
最新
They don't get much worse than this. I bookmarked it straight into my Hall Of Shame folder.
役立つ
sedevacantist website. They think the Living Magisterium of the Church rest on their shoulders and have an authority interpreting the Sacred Tradition. Avoid.
2
Spam promoting conspiracy theories.
3
A conspiracy site for the tinfoil hat brigade masquerading as a Catholic organisation. Dangerous derp and pseudo-science. It's anti-Semitic, homophobic, and racist. Virulently anti-vaccination, it spreads all the propaganda and lies of the anti-vax lunatic fringe. It's a danger to public health and safety. AVOID!
2
I am not a Catholic, but the arguments of this site are shallow and unreasonable. I don't see how it could be considered dangerous, although I also don't see any point in visiting it. Like most sites of this ilk, they complain about Ecumenism and refer to the Roman Catholics as "the Vatican II sect." Apparently they figure that the mainstream broke off from THEM doctrinally, rather than THEY having broken off from the mainstream organizationally. A lot of what they say is just unreasonableness, e.g. " John Paul II did the equivalent of worshiping at the tomb of Mahomet when he kissed the blasphemous Koran" -So, is it WORSHIP for you to kiss a Bible? For a man to kiss his wife? I didn't think Catholics saw it that way. Whatever their legitimate complaints may be, they seem to be twisting things to make their opponents look bad. Their refutation of "Saturday Sabbath" struck me as odd. They insist that Sunday was a holy day on shoehorned and indirect evidence, without specific Biblical command, when this is precisely what is done by those they're arguing against. I was pleased to see, however, that they note that the Sabbath is no longer binding, as Colossians 2:16-17 says. But they ought to have just started with that rather than doggedly trying to vindicate Sunday. Their arguments on 'Christology' were not convincing. Particularly their citing John 8:58. I've encountered the "before Abraham was I AM" argument everywhere from Baptists to Mormon Encyclopedias, and it just isn't tenable. Its true that at Exodus 3:13-16 God ascribes that to himself, but he also calls himself 'the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.' How is that relevant? According to Peter's words at Acts 3:13 this he is the one who glorified Jesus. Clarifying matters at 2 Peter 1:17, it is THE FATHER who glorified Jesus. Further, Jesus himself said that the God of the Jews is the Father at John 8:54, and this is reiterated for Christians at 1 Corinthians 8:5, 6, which says that there is "One God, the Father, and one Lord, Jesus Christ." And even Jesus' lordship, according to Acts 2:36, was received from God (i.e. the Father, as John 5:27 clarifies.) So really, there is no possible way that Jesus is claiming to be "I AM", or even that Jesus is God, unless the Father and Son are one person (which is manifestly absurd.) -Just as any reference to 'Caesar being on the Denarius' doesn't mean that he is actually ON the coin, but his image is, so too John 1:1, John 20:28, and other verses must be understood in context of 2 Corinthians 4:4 "he is the IMAGE of God." According to John 5:26, Jesus only has life in himself because THE FATHER gave it to him, so it is clearly a misjudgement to say that Acts 3:15 can establish Jesus' deity. According to John 20:21, Jesus was sent by God, so it is no surprise that "the manner in which Jesus spoke" resembled that of God. -Although it is asserted that this distorted teaching is "a truth which must be held by all who want to be saved and possess the true Faith" -it has no association with truth, as it is contrary to most of the Bible, with the exception of a few vague verses which are flagrant distortions of their meaning, or even with faith, for to imagine that such a doctrine is possible, much less scriptural, requires, not faith, but naivete and credulity. (and as long and sprawling as this portion may seem, I have had to omit a great deal for the sake of brevity.) I'll briefly comment on their bookstore. Most of their prices are no more than you usually encounter, but the Douay-Rheims Bible is $45! You can usually find these much cheaper at a St. Vincent De Paul store in hard copy, or for FREE as a download at Gutenburg's site (http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1581) Much of the site is inflammatory (thus the reviews) and probably isn't very strong on accuracy. But the site has no viruses, and no real explicit content.
3
This is a True Catholic site which exposes how and why the Catholic Church has been taken over by the consistently heretical Vatican ll sect. If you're Catholic and you're wondering why all the horrible and strange things are happening in the Church, this will connect all the dots.
1
Is not a Roman Catholic site. This is a sect. May God have mercy on the creators of this site.
10
This website is fabulous, I recommend it to people of all rank, religions and even catholics, for the salvation of their souls, and for advice on how to live their daily life
2
侵害されていないか確認するGoogle に接続して閲覧履歴をスキャンします。
Google と接続
掲載されているもの
サインインすることで、当社の定めるデータ収集と使用に同意したことになります。 利用規約 及び 個人情報保護方針
alternative-placeholder

WOT について

私たちは 200 万以上のウェブサイトをレビューしました。 WOT は、迅速かつ安全にブラウジングできるように設計された軽量拡張機能です。 ブラウザをクリーンアップし、速度を上げ、個人情報を保護します。

これはあなたのウェブサイトですか?

ウェブサイトを申請して、WOT のビジネス ツールにアクセスし、顧客とつながりましょう。
このウェブサイトを連携する
このサイトでは分析とパーソナライズのために Cookie を使用しています。 続行すると、当社の クッキーポリシー。
受け入れる